hi with node/1832386691 it looks like you've just added it back as a member of the Bankstown Line relation. However changeset/79213300 just removed it one day ago since the line no longer uses that platform. Are you sure you're correct, if your unsure could you revert this?

See https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/355252140 where you removed the oneway=yes, but I've fixed this now. By the way "Princes" is correct not "Princess".

Sorry but if you set avoid motorways then you can't really complain when it avoids this motorway! Not all motorways are toll roads, if you want to avoid toll roads set avoid tolls not avoid motorways.

This section has no roundabouts, so I and although it's not named motorway I think it fits OSM's motorway description.

I fixed the _link classifcations.

I fixed the oneways, could you fix the _link classifications?

I noticed you've also remove a few oneway=yes from exits/entrances and remove _link classification which is incorrect. I'm fixing this for you. Could you explain what you were trying to change in your changeset?

This is looking more and more like a motorway now since the removal of at grade intersections, the increased speed limit, lack of traffic lights now.

This is not the correct way to fix this... probably better to just omit the name completely.

why not use alt_name? name_1 is deprecated name=*

I reverted your change because the wikidata entry you used is for a bay ie a body of water. The OSM feature relation/1214649 already has that wikidata id, this relation is for the administrative boundary not the body of water.

just a tip, although not essential, it's best practice to try and use the existing node as part of the new way and transfer the tags across, that helps retain the history a bit better than deleting the node completely. it's not always possible though, or easy so again not essential.

Top job!

no worries!

I've fixed the format, it should just be en:Title not the full URL.

I've fixed this now, since it does look like you'd dragged it accidentally.

ALso I notice you're using Nearmap as your imagery, could you please confirm that you're licensed to derive data and have no restrictions on that derived data? Lastly it looks like this is part of a teachosm project, was this change done as part of a mapping event?

Hi, trees are better represented as nodes, natural=wood is for larger areas covered by trees not individual trees.

hi you've also moved the toilets https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78856934

Was that accidental, if so could you fix it please?

duration and interval tags here are very approximate

aren't locked, in which case it just means you need to out of the car to open it, but can still pass though.

That's a different kind of gate, you've used waterway=lock_gate

You could instead use:
barrier=gate
then say which modes of transport can and can't use it so typically
foot=yes
bicycle=yes
motor_vehicle=no (or motor_vehicle=private)

It's not well document but you could also use locked=yes as some gates aren'