Unfortuantly per osm.wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Queensland most of the QLD QSpatial sources aren't permitted to be used in OSM. We can use the Geoscape Admin Boundaries dataset which is released quarterly.

Good work migrating the the turn lanes and placement tags correctly! Impressive to do it in iD without the visual feedback you get in JOSM with the "Lane and road attributes" style.

hi, not sure what happened here, but I think you wanted to split this way into two features, one as a fire trail and another as a path, but somehow you ended up with two overlapping ways. I've fixed this now.

It looks like you've tried to fix the overlapping ways, however changeset/163884869 showed the intent was to split it into track and trail. I've restored the track deleted here and fixed the overlap.

Yeah I agree that it's hard to decide, and that railway=funicular includes both technical funicular's where there must be two tracks and two cars, joined by the same cable to counterbalance each other and "inclined railways where the vehicle(s) are moved by cables, but which are not necessarily a funicular from a technical standpoint".

Then inclined elevators or inclinators aren't given a definition on the wiki and if you read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclined_elevator they are just a type of cable railway.

In terms of their form, function highway=elevator as an inclinator is better here especially where there is just a booth, or single seat or open platform instead of a larger railway car.

I doubt these are funicular's "in which a cable attached to a pair of tram-like vehicles on rails moves them up and down" more likely these are inclinators which are tagged as linear ways with highway=elevator
highway=elevator?uselang=en#Inclined_elevators

For example way/1226061885

If the house is built on piers it may have been built over the water, it could be always over the water even at low tide, or only during hide tide, but either way it's expected that the two polygons could overlap.

hi I think it's good to remove the lane since there's no separated way, however the bus stop node needs highway=bus_stop per highway=bus_stop plus the other tags for public transport https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/1817076180

it's best to try and retain existing ways and just tweak them as needed per osm.wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history however I realise that's not always possible or easy, just something to keep in mind.

looks good

I couldn't see anything attached to it, so have deleted the duplicate.

hi you've left some URLs in node/12658008910 and other nodes

As far as I can tell https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1360049806 was not duplicated, any reason for the deletion?

Looks like you have some duplicates
way/1359830887/history
way/1360049809/history

Also not sure why https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1360049806 was removed by another user since it wasn't duplicated...

hi the Esri World Imagery has bad resolution here, so please don't change building geometries which are very accurately mapped from high resolution DCS NSW Imagery to match worse resolution imagery.

Due to this I've reverted this changeset.

hi not sure why two features were deleted here? It's too hard to tell from the imagery sourced you've used and DCS NSW Imagery still shows them clearly. I've also fixed the positioning of the other building you moved. It's fine for building/water to overlap where they do on the ground.

I've improved this to shift the coastline to highest visible tide per imagery. Also please note that in this area the Esri World Imagery won't have the best alignment, usually the DCS NSW Imagery is best for alignment.

I've tweaked this to shift the shoreline to highest visible tide on imagery.

I've tweaked the area here to improve the accuracy.

hi similar to my previous comment it's not correct to just shift the building/waterway so they don't overlap if in reality they do. coastline and river shorelines are mapped to high tide, which from the DCS NSW Imagery here is much closer to the building and likely covers part of it.