I don't have the local knowledge to know what it is called now. Only per the GNB, addressing data, and admin boundaries, "Berowra Creek" only exists as the watercourse name, not as a named place.

In the GNB Berowra Creek suburb node/117103168 is discontinued and is now part of the existing Berowra Waters suburb. Do you think we should either just delete this node or change it to was:place=hamlet? Though if the locals still call it Berowra Creek I guess it still exists, just doesn't form part of the admin boundary.

Hey mate, I just noticed that this way you contributed for Mt Saddleback Track exactly matches the geometry appearing in Land Tasmania's Transport Segments open data.
Just curious did you create this originally yourself from GPS, and they sourced it from here in OSM or did you source it from their dataset?

comment should have been https://maproulette.org/challenge/20137/task/101563718

Hi typically we don't map temporary popup things like this which are just open for one day every few years per osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features

Further it looks like the geometries are quite a bit off. I'll remove the ones I spot.

Thanks! I'll have to revisit for another attempt. I would have suggested we add that to description=* which is used to provide additional information to the end map user, but it's limited to 255 characters.

I'd consider changing access=permissive to access=yes then. Per access=* "permissive" means it's private but the owner generally allows access, but that might change at any time. "yes" means it's public right of way.
I just added one of the foreshore bush tracks yesterday, but I'm sure there are more missing short tracks still to be mapped.

I tried to access Merlon Pathway, but couldn't find it without risking trespassing. It was very unclear where was private and where was public, and didn't look accessible. I guess I just needed to push on and if I found myself in someones house by accident then apologise. Have you physically surveyed this by walking through?

Have you seen StreetComplete https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete#readme helps survey details of these houses. And if you instead add them as generic building=yes then on the ground it will ask if it's detached, duplex, terrace, apartments etc.

A bubbler you could also use amenity=drinking_water
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108006048

if the gate can still be opened by emergency services, national parks staff etc then better to set as motor_vehicle=private, motor_vehicle=no means there is no access even for those legally allowed.

You're really on the ball with these updates, nice work!

I don't think way/732339055 and similar should be tagged as leisure=park. A park leisure=park is an area of open space for recreational use. I can't go here to kick a ball around, sit around, or throw a picnic, so I don't think leisure=park should apply.

Hey you do realise many of these contact details were already tagged under the contact:* prefix?

oh interesting I didn't realise there was a track along the creek here connecting the other tracks. I'll have to check it out.

I've removed the overlapping beach sections here and split them into a few with different names.

hi it looks like you've added two overlapping beaches here so I've removed one so we have just the single beach. The south beach you've set the name as Mm could you please explain that?

It's good practice to try and modify existing objects rather than deleting and adding new ones to retain the history osm.wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history. In iD you can right click the node and select disconnect.

1. May I suggest trail_visibility=* it sounds like it might be bad or intermediate.

2. Per osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things the name should be the proper name only, the one you entered can be added as a description tag. Or better yet, encode that information in tags. eg trailblazed=cairns trailblazed=*#Values

Hi please see the comment on changeset/107117225, the beach is already mapped. I have retained your area but used the JOSM replace geometry tool to retain the history from the original node and bring in the additional tags.

What's E473?

I'll change the surface to using a ; as value separator.