reverted in changeset/105460498

reverted in changeset/105488443 since this disconnected the lookout and the path, and because the paths probably do go to the waters edge

reverted in changeset/105461286

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/589839759 probably goes continue to go into the shelter, the warning in iD doesn't mean the path must be moved

the building deleted here shows up on the DCS imagery, and it's unclear on other imagery.

these paths go to the waters edge so should connect

I've been there, surveyed this, it's not a tunnel.

hi from the imagery it's not clear these are actually bridges

hi from the imagery it looks like there may be a path here, so I don't think it's right to delete.

hi, I don't see the point in tag fiddling source:geometry and source:position they mean the same thing and both are common.

hi, I've also sent a note to the MapRoulette Challenge author, but I'll also ask you, how do you know there is actually a ford here and there's not a foot bridge?

FYI you've added a level crossing between a railway tunnel and a surface road. I've fixed this now, but the question is, has this happened in other locations too?

You might want to check out the NSW Floods imagery which is probably the most recent for this area. Should be coming into editors soon.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103600984

Actually in this case you can set the building type as semi, I just updated this one so you can see.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103618237

Are you sure there is a camp site here? I can't see anything from the imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103191492

way/917870231 are you sure that's a beach? It looks more like a tidal flat which is tagged as wetland=tidalflat

Hi, I don't have the local knowledge here but what exactly is the "Lower Western Foreshore" referring to? According to google a "foreshore" is "the part of a shore between high- and low-water marks, or between the water and cultivated or developed land.", so it's just a narrow strip or just the coastline part? Because we already have a natural=water for Pittwater, so trying to understand what this feature you added represents.

Thanks, that's what I intended.

There were two buildings here deleted, from what I can tell there are still here, is that not the case?

1/3. Yes the area tag for offices is landuse=commercial. landuse=commercial

The postal facility, I'd still tag this as landuse=commercial I think it' mostly fits better based on the wiki descriptions for commercial and industrial.

2. I added those building footprints as rough outlines. You're welcome to improve the geometry if you like, but even as a rough outline I think it's still helpful to show where the building is vs not having it at all. I also added the outline so that StreetComplete would prompt for the building quests, and having a way is helpful when on the ground surveying to know which building the quests relate to.

> → Better with https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101694915 ?
Where possible it's better practice to update existing objects instead of deleting then adding, but I know this isn't always practical.

The DCS imagery has the best alignment here, so I'll adjust to that. I still noticed another set of townhouses was deleted in your later changeset.

> PS: Do you know the name of way/921646704 ?
Looks like a generic office building with no obvious name from the outside.