OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
92075662

looks good. There is a clear "Private Road" sign showing for Sea Street so all good. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-33.83224722222223&lng=151.150425&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=kX6AM3TbnIBbucyHzmHizA&x=0.4532493606392&y=0.5196650251542435&zoom=0.8103975535168195

91797243

If signposted it's still okay to map the relation, because you're mapping the signage.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91797243

91539776

The tag for driveways is highway=service + service=driveway, I've fixed this.

91546361

also highway=service + service=driveway is the tag to use for these driveways I've fixed that up in changeset/91570614 see service=driveway

91546361

I've unglued the power line which you glued to the road changeset/91570584

91567718

Usually there are no pedestrian signs where you can't walk, so assuming those are present here, then all good.

69292936

hi I updated the name and ref for way/45728168 based on sinage

91466601

hi what's your source for the speed limit and name? this road was already mapped with a different name. Since this added a duplicate road segment on top I'll revert in the meantime.

91472554

hi what's your source for the speed limit and classification? This road was already mapped, the one you added was a duplicate on top so I'll revert this for now until you can confirm.

91396007

hi, generally if you're adding many buildings if you could do a few before uploading instead of saving each building as a changeset.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91396007

91302238

Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap. It looks like you've traced out a few driveways as areas and tagged them as buildings. Things should only be tagged building where they are a structure with walls and a roof, which is not a driveway, you can map driveways as a linear way (line) and tag it as a driveway instead.
Also for buildings it should be the footprint of the building not the whole land parcel, so the backyard shouldn't be included.

91208700

Great work. I saw this one recently but wasn't on my bike so didn't manage to grab a trace. There looked like cycleway on the eastern side too.

90668726

Probably the hosted routing engines didn't update. When I tested now with the GraphHopper hosted router on osm.org it avoids routing through Walumetta Drive, but will route through it if the end point is along it (which is how it should work for destination).
OSRM hosted by FOSSGIS might not have updated, or it might not handle destination correctly.

91099882

Generally creating no-existent paths for the router is controversial. I've been tollerant of the ones going along beaches, even though I don't agree with them (there's no marked path along the beach so it shouldn't be mapped as a bath), but this is just an open area from the imagery I can't see much evidence of a path, is there anything on the ground?

91147948

Though true these should have been with the :lanes suffix like you added, but the destination part comes from you being allowed to drive in a bus lane if you're accessing a driveway (ie. destination along the road). Not saying this is how it should work, but it's explains why.

91147948

the tags you removed here were lane tags, so the access restrictions only applied to the left lane not the whole road. This is tagging per osm.wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Bus_Lanes_and_Bus_Only_Lanes happy to discuss if this is correct or not but probably needs a wider discussion on the list.

91117224

Oops, good catch.

90668726

Okay thanks for the explanation. However in that case motor_vehicle=no is not correct because it blocks even residents from access. For no through routes the documented way to may this is with the destination access value, see access=*#List_of_possible_values ie. motor_vehicle=destination. I've updated the tag based on this.

I've also added the turn restrictions as I could see from Mapillary and as you've indicated here at the Gas Works Road end.

90945624

PS. it's fine to use @username for the twitter details, contact:twitter=* specified that either the page URL or @username is fine.

90950298

Do you need a relation here? You can add a way which covers the grounds and then add any buildings inside the grounds, and then the spatial relationship shows which buildings are part of the fire station. eg way/42441888