Hi while it's not harmful to specify lanes:forward and lanes:backward, where the lanes tag is already set and is even and where oneway is not yes, then it's assumed forward and back are just half of the lanes tag.

Hi I've reverted this change because as you said yourself, it does exist on the ground, and generally if it exists on the ground it's fair game to be mapped see also osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground. I have updated it to use the power=minor_line tag which is a better fit for these smaller lines power=minor_line

hi for future reference if you want to to make a note without editing, just add a note and please don't use the viewpoint tag as a note.

Hi looks good, but I noticed a couple you did as multipolygon relations but they only have a single outer member. Any particular reason these weren't just done as a regular way?

According to amenity=ferry%20terminal it should be public_transport=stop_position not station. I think this point was meant to only represent the stop_position in the public transport relation osm.wiki/Public_transport#Service_routes. Have you considered all the wiki documentation for this change? I haven't taken the time yet to fully dig into it, but are you sure this change is correct?

I did a Mapillary survey, path is open so I removed the access=no.

I did a Mapillary survey just now, confirmed that a block is restricting vehicle access, but bicycle and pedestrian is still accessible, I've updated the area just now.

Hi, for https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/22978301 what does access=no mean?

Hi what's the access=no here for? If it's open, you can just leave off the access tag.

Hi, welcome to OSM. This section of light rail is electrically powered from the ground via APS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground-level_power_supply. I've updated the wiki at electrified=* to note this value. I believe electrified=no should only be used for rail which is not powered and not the case here, so I've reverted this change.

Since it was created and last edited in 2012 if you couldn't find it probably okay to delete.

Hi there doesn't appear to be any park here based on the aerial imagery, so this change has been reverted. If that's not the case if you could help contribute some OpenStreetCam or Mapillary or photos of the area to confirm.

Actually way/679354513/history should have public_transport=station and way/34891023 should have railway=station per railway=station one is from the train network perspective and the other from the passenger perspective.

Hi welcome to OSM. For next time, the name should only be if the building/apartments have a proper name. If they don't have a name you can leave it out. The street number is not a name. See also name=*

I don't have any local knowledge here so can't comment on the specifics but highway=track does a good job of documenting the difference between highway=track and highway=residential and when each should be used.

Hi and welcome to OSM. In general if things exist on the ground then they can be added to OSM, that includes driveways on private property. For driveways you can add the tag service=driveway and to mark access as private then access=private could be added.

I've reverted your change to reinstate these driveways.

Also for way/279298841/history is there some signage which says bicycles are not allowed? Otherwise what's the reason for bicycle=no?

Also for way/173974614/history access=private already says it's a private driveway, so I'm not sure what bicycle=no means here? Is it needed?

Hi could you please add the attribution for this dataset to the Transport for NSW section at osm.wiki/Contributors this is required per the agreement that TfNSW signed osm.wiki/File:TfNSW_OSM_CCBY_Signed_Waiver.pdf

Hi for way/276694450/history I rode my bike there 4 years back and can't recall any no bicycle sign, what's your source for bicycles not allowed here?