This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.

This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.

This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.

This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.

This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.

This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.

This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.

This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.

reverted in changeset/81754092

reverted in changeset/81754018 due to unclear use of accessibility= tag and duplicate nodes for features already mapped as ways

reverted since it's unclear what this tag means. We would like to record accessibility information but would ask you discuss this with us first on talk-au and see the wheelchair=* tag.

reverted since these are mostly already mapped as ways

I've removed the marketplace tag from each of these nodes and converted them to osm.wiki/Tag:ref=.

I've just gone through and deleted a lot of duplicates you've added. Bear in mind that many features are mapped as ways and so to ensure we only have one feature in OSM you don't need another node inside, which was the case for the vast majority of your edits, so I've deleted these.

Hi GIID,

Welcome to OSM. Just bear in mind that "So, please, don't make any changes." is not in line with how OSM works, we're a collaborative project and the data is maintained by contributors, of which any one can contribute or improve upon the data you've entered.

You might also want to see osm.wiki/Verifiability, we strive for verifiability and things like restaurant ratings aren't a good fit for OSM since they are subjective and we can't survey them. Where have you sourced these ratings that you've entered from?

Hi in this changeset you added lit=yes to way/34233840 in May 2018 however in my Mapillary image from July 2018 there is no lighting poles visible https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/9_48jZW2lWIcBU9FQkhz4Q are you sure this way is lit?

Hi looks like this change the east bound road of Captain Cook Drive unconnected with Wollooware Road North is that right and still the case now? changeset/81703749 re-added some of those connections for traffic, but without ground level imagery it's hard to verify which is correct.

Is your only source NSW LPI Imagery? One month ago this area was changed in changeset/80055995 due to re-development and construction to remove the turns.

Hi I can't see any evidence of a cycleway at way/286201267 see https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/vYDHTuJkM619XNBMk6GjAw has it since changed since July 2017?

I've changed this back to footway for the time being.