Hi welcome to OSM. Is this road signposted as "bus only", in that case the best tags to use are:

bus=designated + motor_vehicle=no.

The tags you've used currently imply that private vehicles are allowed.

Hi, where you added Officeworks and Domayne to the address nodes, these two were already mapped at way/179623092 and way/179623091. Per one feature, one osm element osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element we should only have "officeworks" once here, so I've removed the one you added to the address node.

also this one I've fixed up see https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77600325/.

Hi welcome to OSM. This wasn't quite right, I've fixed it up. Specifically maxspeed:conditional is the tag key and the 40... is the tag value.

I see you've used service=driveway which is correct, but you'll also need to use highway=service instead of highway=residential. See service=driveway

Your original building https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/411511870 was recently deleted in https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77204977/

If you had any local knowledge on which one is correct, please chime in.

Hi welcome to OSM.

It looks like you've deleted the two turn restrictions that already existing here and then re-added the same turn restrictions or was there some other change you made? I've reinstated the original turn relations.

FYI without the oneway tag, it's assumed two way by default.

+1 change is good thanks.

Though I couldn't help but find the humour in this edit https://twitter.com/alantgeo/status/1199464023198027776.

Hi and welcome to OSM. You've tagged a few small areas here as leisure=park. A leisure=park, leisure=park is meant for "an area of open space for recreational use". Without knowing what exactly these are it's hard to recommend an alternative tag, but you can just tag individual trees as natural=tree.

Hi welcome to OSM.

Since this is a fairly major change that does break the rendering, and it has been extensively discussed on the talk-au mailing list previously, I've reverted this for now until it can be discussed. Feel free to discuss this here or on the talk-au list.

Hi welcome to OSM.

Bundeena Bay is already mapped at node/910343349 as a bay and the water area covered by Gunnamatta Bay and Port Hacking is already mapped out. Since this is a fairly major change that does break the rendering, and it has been extensively discussed on the talk-au mailing list previously, I've reverted this for now until it can be discussed. Feel free to discuss this here or on the talk-au list.

You're right, in the imagery I can see the dashed centerline, so it's not oneway. Thanks.

just based on the road design I'm pretty sure this is oneway. But I don't have any other evidence to support that claim.

same issue here with https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/4071253690. I've now fixed this for you to revert back before the copyrighted data was imported.

hi this is not an empty node, it's an address point, which is useful for people trying to find addresses. I've reverted you change now.

It looks like you've deleted the whole object here even though it had a history before you added the copyrighted data https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/3921515360. I've fixed this in changeset/77595085 reinstating the object before you imported the copyrighted data.

Why did you delete the building part with 13 levels? https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77555491 you can see here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-33.883174999999994&lng=151.1994222222222&z=17&pKey=2Kbad7xrPYXJk5pj4PRClQ&focus=photo&x=0.16499854186919266&y=0.272912570917576&zoom=0 that there is a building part which is higher than the rest of the building.

@ortho_is_hot They will all be reverted/redacted anyway see changeset/77550725

In the contributor terms you agreed to on signup https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms "Your contribution of data should not infringe the intellectual property rights of anyone else." Data from the sources you've listed is not your IP and it can't be included in OSM.

I'll need to ask the OSM Data Working to redact the data you've added as it's in breach of the contributor terms.

Are all your your other edits from the same sources?