Have these escalators at https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/591448312 and seen at https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-33.935713888888884&lng=151.1651527777778&z=17&pKey=QgXdlTltdfXp4yK8grWhyg&focus=photo&x=0.39884012279205605&y=0.5745279512762695&zoom=1.3403582718651212 been removed?

Hi, it looks like you've mapped some roundabouts as diveded ways: way/595008484#map=19/-33.95583/150.99427
According to osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways two ways should only be used when physically separated in a major way. This one here isn't physically separated and regardless a small traffic island doesn't usually need the way to be split. It's a lot easier to model the real road without splitting the way. What do you reckon?
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/YBC0r-3EudYGLodM57oByg

Thanks! PS. When editing around here if you change to the Maxar background layer it's slightly more up to date than the default background layer.

Roads are assumed to be two way unless specified as oneway. Specifying oneway=no is not harmful, but not needed unless you want to be explicit or if it's unclear and you want to indicate to other mappers this really is two way even though it might look like oneway.

natural=wetland looks like the correct tag see wetland=*

It won't show up blue if you've picked a wetland type which is mostly vegetation.

It was named that when I mapped it, but likely they abandoned it now.

reverted, seo spam

I've added the club=sport tag to this.

documenting this changeset was reverted in changeset/73962085

@ecoeng Changeset comments are to provide context or a description of what the change is and why it's being made, not to make personal attacks against other contributors.

I invite you to join in the discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-September/012863.html

@ecoeng Please see the discussion over at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-September/012863.html

I believe it's common practice not to name link roads (Denham Street), this is also noted at highway=tertiary_link, because in this case the link road is not really part of either road.

https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68161831/ in this changeset you've dropped the cycleway and surface attributes, I've fixed this up now, but try to watch out for this next time.

looks good now, thanks.

I didn't hear back yet, so I've gone ahead and restored these

Re https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/520768412 is this way no longer a parking aisle? To me it looks like a parking aisle as it runs through the carpark and feeds into spaces, https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/6-HMaOeNnuch3jphlbmmNw

Regarding https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/639590232 building=service is correct for buildings which house transformers per building=*#Power.2FTechnical_buildings

The bollard needs to be on the way so that routers know that this bollard affects the way. While I sympathise that you want to map each bollard individually, could you just use a count tag or something instead?

PS. I'm commenting because you requested a review to your changeset.

looks good, if you want you could add the phone number in the international format +61 2 xxxx xxxx, which is more correct.

If it's only japanese food I'd leave off the asian cuisine, I'd only use that for a restaurant that either I can't tell which specific type of asian cuisine it is, or it serves a variety of asian cuisine.