Hi,

1. Please do not change private gated roads to access=permissive. A gated road is clearly private.
2. Please do not change private roads to highway=track. highway=track is intended for land access roads, not for residential roads for access to houses.

Intended CS description was "updated foot paths and surface attributes.

JOSM somehow uploaded my changeset on me prematurely.

'I have reverted this changeset for the following reason:
fantasy edits'

changeset/143595089

'I have reverted this changeset for the following reason:
fantasy edits'

changeset/143595089

'I have reverted this changeset for the following reason:
fantasy edits'

changeset/143595089

'I have reverted this changeset for the following reason:
fantasy edits'

changeset/143595089

'I have reverted this changeset for the following reason:
fantasy edits'

changeset/143595089

'I have reverted this changeset for the following reason:
fantasy edits'

changeset/143595089

'I have reverted this changeset for the following reason:
fantasy edits'

changeset/143595089

'I have reverted this changeset for the following reason:
fantasy edits'

changeset/143595089

'I have reverted this changeset for the following reason:
fantasy edits'

changeset/143595089

'I have reverted this changeset for the following reason:
fantasy edits'

changeset/143595089

'I have reverted this changeset for the following reason:
fantasy edits'

changeset/143595089

In this car case, a huge piece of the loop was missing, so even a trivial check would have caught it.

The algorithm for boundary validity is not hard. I do it in Streetferret. You just gather up all the member ways and make sure each endpoint has a matching endpoint on the same or another way. Then you check that all the inner loops are outside an outer loop. In any case, there is definitely a QA site with boundary validity.

On the satellite view it looked expressway-like to me, but if you have a better local understanding feel free to adjust it.

This boundary is broken (relation/119236)

This was the last edit to touch it. I'm sure this bot edit wasn't the one that broke the boundary, but now it's hard to tell what the culprit was. It would be ideal if a bot edit working on boundaries might also check to see if the boundary is valid.

This boundary is broken: relation/37376

Should be a primary expressway instead.

landuse=forest and natural=wood means the same thing, trees.

While some mappers have tried to use =forest to mean managed forest, many others use it as a synonym. I personally think it's a waste of time to draw a distinction. I think natural=wood where trees are present is a perfectly acceptable way to map wooded areas.