ZeLonewolf's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 185977426 | DWG Ticket#2026071910000019
|
|
| 169676139 | Nice work! |
|
| 182146365 | Boundary for Tri Pond should exist in the state GIS layer. Will see if I can locate it. |
|
| 181495248 | Edit discussed at:
The emerging consensus from the US community appears to be that this deletion is in error. |
|
| 181482441 | Discussion link:
|
|
| 131020795 | I am not sure what you're trying to say. |
|
| 131020795 | I can only do so much. |
|
| 131020795 | I disagree, feel free to open a forum thread. |
|
| 171339086 | Yea I encountered a bunch of lines drawn in pretty silly ways noted in this discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-feature-proposal-flowlines/117361/32 so that's probably the venue |
|
| 167157565 | This is the sign that is posted at the entrance:
Did you see differently? See also this discussion:
|
|
| 173296513 | Ref: DWG Ticket#2025101510000281 |
|
| 173296513 | Hi folks,
|
|
| 171926973 | I've just added the wood multipolygon. Go team! |
|
| 171926973 | Yes, please make the changes. Tag leisure=nature_reserve on the outer boundary, tag natural=wood polygons where the trees/natural areas are (whether inside or outside the boundary), and reduce leisure=park to just the manicured bits. |
|
| 171926973 | I agree with Steve's take. The wild and wooded parts cannot be leisure=park, only the manicured bits. That's a well-established US convention. |
|
| 172812724 | By all means open a forum discussion. |
|
| 172730865 | Thanks, should be fixed in changeset/172770657 |
|
| 172504205 | The highest_point member fails the JOSM validator, recommend filing an issue with JOSM. |
|
| 171795836 | Discussion at: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-user-keeps-changing-trunk-to-motorway OSM's motorway definition at: |
|
| 160852047 | Relations are just a collection of member ways. I'm not sure what you're asking. |