Hi, this changeset marked part of US 412 as a dirt road, is that accurate?

This is a geographically wide-scale edit of items copied from an external database. That's an import in my book. Looking at each item manually to check that it was copied correctly out of the book doesn't turn it into a survey.

The source provided is CC-BY 4.0 and must be reverted because the license is incompatible with OSM.

Yeah, I would regard these one-by-one boundary updates to be completely routine, casual mapping activity in the US. This is also being discussed in OSMUS Slack #imports and there seems to be general agreement on this point.

Pascal, I would regard the updating of a single boundary to new geometry from the USG to be a routine maintenance activity.

Thanks!

Thanks for adding these names! For future reference, street names should be unabbreviated, i.e., "Drive" "Street" "Avenue" etc.

Curious about the "The Legal Tender"/Pflueger name. The website seems to indicate "The Legal Tender" as the main name, and I'm not sure why name:en_US is tagged rather than just name:en if we need a separate English name?

Thanks!

Reverted in changeset/129884059

Hello! Thanks for adding these businesses. Please use "US" in "addr:country" rather than "USA".

Hi! When setting addr:country, please set it to "US" rather than "USA".

Thanks for doing this. If you're inclined, there's still a whole bunch of errant objects that come up on a name search for "River Thames" in the area, especially stray or side_stream ways that need to get added to the main waterway relation.

Hello! Just a note that the convention is not to put the name of a river on the water area. That only needs to go on the waterway line that runs through it. Otherwise it confuses renderers and geocoders.

Hello,

I noticed you mapped "Randall Park" as encompassing all of the two cemeteries as well as print works pond. That doesn't seem correct?

I'll let you sort the exact location of the boundary lines. In the meantime, at least I've got an intact geometry for data processing ;)

In theory fixed in changeset/129760445

FYI, Tulsa city boundary is reporting errors in JOSM.
relation/184985

Not sure what changeset caused it.

Keep up the good work!

Looks like I had some kind of issue with JOSM not closing my changesets. Sorry about the large bounding box!