Thanks for improving this area!

The current version is an over simplification I feel, that sliver I cut out cannot be navigated with a wheelchair.

For me the pedestrian area represents an area that can be navigated without passing though steps. Had it been a ramp that would be a different story.

What I had added can be seen here: https://dynamic-media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-o/32/a5/2a/71/cool.jpg?w=1000&h=-1&s=1

Shown better here: https://files.nms.ac.uk/production/Documents/National-Museum-of-Scotland/2024/Visual-Story-Main-Entrance-Updated-10-May-2024.pdf?dm=1719843440

Those white lines are the step edge markers.

Not yet added is the right side entrance:
https://queensferry.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/edinburgh-national-museums-chambers-street.webp

or: https://www.edinburgharchitecture.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/national-museum-scotland-edinburgh-aw-520x390.webp

Note these images are just reference we should not use them to add the feature.

Which has a step up and therefore a disconnect from the pedestrian way.

I had to walk along through the parking lot, I guess it would be best if somebody could confirm the sign. Unfortunately I didn't think to take a picture.

Added shrubbery tags

I visited this location and that part is for the service bus that comes down the hill. There was explicitly a no entry sign.

Each stair extends a little further to the right until it leave a small area. The new gap on the right is where another large staircase is.

There's a staircase that cuts into the pedestrian way.

Thanks for fixing!

However about: 35.5230808/139.6894337

I disagree, there is clearly a baseball field. I think it's okay to have multi and overlapped but if we can recognize a pitch outline we can add it.

We can clearly see the baseball shaped fence and base lines at the coordinates I linked.

Overall I agree with your modifications to my changeset though! Let's work together.

Why is this named Ragas, and another nearby edit named Sagar?

Sorry wrong changeset. This comment was meant for: 159044438

Does this really exist? It's not present on Bing imagery, also looking at the nearby mapillary imagery I can't see it.

Does this really exist? It's not present on Bing imagery, also looking at the nearby mapillary imagery I can't see it.

Is this building really called example?

Sounds good, thanks for sharing!

Are the names really displayed like that or is the branch?

e.g. name:ja=セブンイレブン　西千葉駅南口店
vs.
branch:ja=セブンイレブン　西千葉駅南口店

Is the "Lyft-owned aerial imagery" compatible with OSM license?

Yes I would say it meets the description.

Based on the Idea that the gsi imagery is more recent and the esri may have glitches I modified it to match the GSI images.

Note that I matched the road to the entering line of the esri imagery but left the internals as they were. That’s why they had a sharp turn. I did not want to make up curve data that could not be verified by arial imagery.

In some places esri is more recent so in Toyama it can be difficult to map.

I recently drove through a bypass under construction which is wrong in all imagery layers.

Thanks for keeping an eye out for this, and alerting me. Let’s continue to improve the map together.

Best regards,
Zaneo

I think the esri imagery and Japan imagery may disagree about the curve. Do we know dates for each imagery? I can correct my edits to Japan gis if that’s more current.

Why? This is a logically grouped change set.

Next time please view the bounding box with a better tool, is an equally valid response.