OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
181577047

It's a bit strange for shop details that can't be seen from aerial images.

181577047

The source was listed as: Bing; OpenStreetMap Carto (Standard)

That's why I asked. Happy to hear that it's not automated! Thanks for your contributions.

181577047

How did you map this from Bing and Carto overlay? Is this an automated edit?

180710544

Thanks for improving this area!

180081710

The current version is an over simplification I feel, that sliver I cut out cannot be navigated with a wheelchair.

For me the pedestrian area represents an area that can be navigated without passing though steps. Had it been a ramp that would be a different story.

What I had added can be seen here: https://dynamic-media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-o/32/a5/2a/71/cool.jpg?w=1000&h=-1&s=1

Shown better here: https://files.nms.ac.uk/production/Documents/National-Museum-of-Scotland/2024/Visual-Story-Main-Entrance-Updated-10-May-2024.pdf?dm=1719843440

Those white lines are the step edge markers.

Not yet added is the right side entrance:
https://queensferry.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/edinburgh-national-museums-chambers-street.webp

or: https://www.edinburgharchitecture.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/national-museum-scotland-edinburgh-aw-520x390.webp

Note these images are just reference we should not use them to add the feature.

Which has a step up and therefore a disconnect from the pedestrian way.

180063425

I had to walk along through the parking lot, I guess it would be best if somebody could confirm the sign. Unfortunately I didn't think to take a picture.

180103384

Added shrubbery tags

180063425

I visited this location and that part is for the service bus that comes down the hill. There was explicitly a no entry sign.

180081710

Each stair extends a little further to the right until it leave a small area. The new gap on the right is where another large staircase is.

180081710

There's a staircase that cuts into the pedestrian way.

168582544

Thanks for fixing!

However about: 35.5230808/139.6894337

I disagree, there is clearly a baseball field. I think it's okay to have multi and overlapped but if we can recognize a pitch outline we can add it.

We can clearly see the baseball shaped fence and base lines at the coordinates I linked.

Overall I agree with your modifications to my changeset though! Let's work together.

159044359

Why is this named Ragas, and another nearby edit named Sagar?

159044393

Sorry wrong changeset. This comment was meant for: 159044438

159044438

Does this really exist? It's not present on Bing imagery, also looking at the nearby mapillary imagery I can't see it.

159044393

Does this really exist? It's not present on Bing imagery, also looking at the nearby mapillary imagery I can't see it.

159044292

Is this building really called example?

158481267

Sounds good, thanks for sharing!

158481267

Are the names really displayed like that or is the branch?

e.g. name:ja=セブンイレブン 西千葉駅南口店
vs.
branch:ja=セブンイレブン 西千葉駅南口店

148578808

Is the "Lyft-owned aerial imagery" compatible with OSM license?

135767129

Yes I would say it meets the description.