Hi, I know this is a somewhat old edit, but please don't change correct OpenStreetMap tags just to make them work for a game or another external data consumer.

amenity=sushi is not the correct tagging here. The place was already tagged as amenity=restaurant with cuisine=sushi, which describes it correctly. I have restored this.

Changing otherwise correct OSM data specifically to make it work for the Coin Hunt game goes against OSM's good practice of mapping what actually exists rather than changing the data for a particular renderer, game, or other data consumer: osm.wiki/Good_practice

Please avoid making edits like this in the future.

Ciao, ho corretto quello che penso stessi cercando di mappare qui.

hgv=no e altri tag di accesso non dovrebbero essere messi su un normale punto della strada, ma sulla strada a cui si applicano.

Inoltre, access=yes, hgv=no era stato inserito come un unico tag. access=yes e hgv=no sono due tag separati e devono essere inseriti separatamente.

All’incrocio ci sono cartelli che obbligano i mezzi pesanti provenienti da Via Madonna a proseguire dritto. Per questo, invece di usare hgv=no sul punto o hgv:lanes:backward=no su un piccolo tratto di Via del Glicine, questa restrizione dovrebbe essere mappata come una restrizione di svolta. Ho quindi aggiunto restriction:hgv=only_straight_on.

Ho anche riunito il piccolo tratto separato di Via del Glicine, perché non è necessario dividere la strada in quel punto per questa restrizione.

Un valore di peso come 3.5 t dovrebbe essere aggiunto solo quando un limite di peso è effettivamente indicato sul cartello.

Non sono italiano, quindi potrebbero esserci alcuni errori nel mio testo. Se hai domande, puoi scrivere qui e cercherò di rispondere. :)

No problem, I just wanted to make sure it wasn’t intentional. No worries (:

Hi, I removed the following access=* tag from the pool:

access=privatei_think_people_find_me_quite_easy_to_chat_with_if_they_want_to_talk_to_me_😊_i'm_always_happy_to_have_a_conversation_and_get_to_know_people._i_think_i'm_approachable,_although_i_might_be_a_little_harder_to_read_emotionally_until_someone_gets_to_know

Please don't use the access tag for this.

I believe so, although I’m not completely certain. I can see that @osmviborg removed the address tags shortly afterwards, so I assume the same applies to address ranges as well.

Torpenvej (by Netto) is oneway

There is a oneway sign infront of Torpenvej 11.

Just a friendly reminder not to add address to school areas, buildings, places, or other mapped features. In Denmark, addresses are mapped as separate address nodes imported and maintained automatically from the Danish Address Register (DAR). Keeping them as separate nodes allows their tags and positions to be updated correctly.

osm.wiki/Da:Adresser

Hello the parking lot should not be tagged as oneway.
There is only a no-entry sign at one end, and that alone does not make it one-way.
It is only oneway if there is a oneway sign.

The wiki for oneway
(oneway=*)
says "Note that a no entry sign prohibiting entry from one side or across one point of the road, does not automatically imply that the entire road is oneway (look for oneway signs or road markings)."

There are alreaddy turning restrictions to it.

Hello, please use fixme=* instead of FIXME=*.

I have corrected it to fixme=*.

Wiki: "fixme=*"

@Lostmonkey
Hej jeg satte den som turistattraktion fordi man kunne booke det til at komme ud til fårene til nogle arrangementer men burde havde ændret det nu.

@mueschel Hello, sorry. It was meant to indicate how long the restriction applies, but I set it up incorrectly. I should have removed it now.