I do not think that this building is large enough to fit 806 stores alone, and especially not 3 times that. So the question becomes, why did you add addr:unit=100-867, W101- W703 to all 3 of these addresses.

happy mapping,
Udar

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

there is already a Jersey Mike's mapped at this location, please don't add the POI on top of an existing features like this, that duplicates data and where there is only one place IRL there should only be one object in OSM. see osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element.

happy mapping,
Udar.

I have reverted this in changeset/186397026 due to the above listed issues.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

There are a quite a few issues with this changeset, first, the address added is in the state of Washington and you added this business in Florida, second when you are a unit you shouldn't place your self on a building or building:part, when something is tagged with building:part=* please don't replace it with building=*, the addr:street=* listed uses St and other short code instead of the long form (street in this case) as in OSM the convention is to expand those in road names, you also included the unit number in the addr:street=* that has its own tag and should go in there, you also didn't use the correct format for the opening hours (for more info see opening_hours=*) along with the phone number.

Happy mapping,
Udar

on the latest aerial imagery this is in the middle of the lanes of I 95, please double check the position of this ALPR as I severely doubt that FDOT would allow a pole in the middle of lanes on I 95.

happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

if there are no lanes than =track and =lane would be incorrect. If I am being honest the fact that under Fl law Bikes on roads are treated as vehicles and on sidewalks as pedestrians is something that I have been wondering what the best way to handle is for a while, through certainly in this case it is not lane or track. I will go and start a conversation about this on the OSMUS salck where allot of other folks in the US OSM community are and see what folks think the best way to handle this is.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

I have tried everywhere I could to find any evidence of a bike track along this road have found nothing, so please read the cycleway=* wiki page, specifically the section on bike tracks and double check whether or not this segment of road actually has them, a bike track is a bike lane that is separated from car traffic on the road with kerb's or some other traffic island. I couldn't even find evidence of a bike lane along this segment of road. If there is a bike track (or lane) along a segment of this road I would want to fully map it so if there is any please provide evidence of it.

happy mapping,
Udar

I have already pointed out that the ref=* for a bus stop is not the name of the operator or network (in this case the network) so "Coral Gables Trolley" is not the correct value for the stop number of the bus stop aka the ref=*. Please stop doing this, in a previous comment about this I pointed out an example of the correct way to do this.

Happy mapping,
Udar

this is not sidewalk=both, there is only sidewalk on the right side of this road segment and non on the left, sidewalk=both implies that both the right and left sides of the road have a sidewalk, and as there is only sidewalk on the right it is incorrect.

happy mapping,
Udar.

why is node/14041456704 in the middle of the road?

happy mapping,
Udar

Two issues with this changeset, first in the future please do not attach landuse areas to sidewalk centerlines and second in the future please leave a better changeset comment actually describing what you did in the changeset, for more info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments , this is especially true for this changeset as it seemingly didn't change or add a single tag.

Happy mapping,
Udar

what are you even trying to represent here because a bus stop is not the best way to represent what the name claims it is, a ferry would probably be much closer.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

I have asked the Facebook team to not do tasks overlapping with https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 , I have also been fixing the MapRoulette tasks in the area once a section is complete in the tasking manager. overlapping changesets like this have a high chance of conflicts due to the ongoing pedestrian project. I would not be opposed if y'all contributed to the OSMUS tasking manager project as long as you map follow the guidelines provided in there.

Happy mapping,
Udar

I have asked the Facebook team to not do tasks overlapping with https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 , I have also been fixing the MapRoulette tasks in the area once a section is complete in the tasking manager. overlapping changesets like this have a high chance of conflicts due to the ongoing pedestrian project. I would not be opposed if y'all contributed to the OSMUS tasking manager project as long as you map follow the guidelines provided in there.

Happy mapping,
Udar

I have asked the Facebook team to not do tasks overlapping with https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 , I have also been fixing the MapRoulette tasks in the area once a section is complete in the tasking manager. overlapping changesets like this have a high chance of conflicts due to the ongoing pedestrian project. I would not be opposed if y'all contributed to the OSMUS tasking manager project as long as you map follow the guidelines provided in there.

Happy mapping,
Udar

I have asked the Facebook team to not do tasks overlapping with https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 , I have also been fixing the MapRoulette tasks in the area once a section is complete in the tasking manager. overlapping changesets like this have a high chance of conflicts due to the ongoing pedestrian project. I would not be opposed if y'all contributed to the OSMUS tasking manager project as long as you map follow the guidelines provided in there.

Happy mapping,
Udar

I have asked the Facebook team to not do tasks overlapping with https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 , I have also been fixing the MapRoulette tasks in the area once a section is complete in the tasking manager. overlapping changesets like this have a high chance of conflicts due to the ongoing pedestrian project. I would not be opposed if y'all contributed to the OSMUS tasking manager project as long as you map follow the guidelines provided in there.

Happy mapping,
Udar

While ref's can have characters in them a ref is not supposed to be the name of the bus system (not Coral Gables Trolley), ref refers to an unique identifier given to an object, for an example see node/1039700670 and https://api.panoramax.xyz/en/index?focus=pic&map=19.9/25.6798389/-80.3681972&pic=11dc3e52-81cc-45c8-a4d5-a2fa58139236&seq=9a38a181-0d50-40b6-b98f-f6d45399ae00&speed=250&theme=default&users=default&xyz=359.00/0.00/30 which is an image of the above linked bus stop. for more info see ref=* .

Happy mapping,
Udar.