Hello thoughtmarketing,
the changeset comment left on this changeset is not the best as "-" doesn't really tell anyone looking at the changeset what the changeset actually does. Good changeset comments are important for future reference for other contributors when reviewing the history of an object and for those reviewing changes that happen within a specific region. Good changeset comments dont have to be long or complicated, just describe what you have done, for example "added a advertising agencies office" would have been more than sufficient for this changeset.
For more info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments .

Happy mapping,
Udar.

please only tag sidewalks on roads once the sidewalks are already mapped separately.

Happy mapping,
Udar

I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar

I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar

I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar

I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar

I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar

I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar

I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar

I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar

it is much preferable to wait to tag sidewalks on roads once they are already separately mapped and then tag with sidewalk:*=separate.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at the apparent location of the new position of this ALPR, the new position seems highly unlikely as on various aerial imagery in iD it is within the road area in such a way that this new position is highly unlikely. Please double check its position and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

From my understanding political boundaries like this only follow road centerlines generally and not the centers of traffic islands splitting the dual carriageway of a road. So it is better to not align to the islands as you have in this changeset.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at the position of this ALPR on several aerial imagery sources in iD it seems incorrect. I highly doubt that they would put a ALPR in the area of the service road like this, especially because it is so close to the entrance of what looks like a drive through. Please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at the position of this ALPR on several aerial imagery sources in iD it seems incorrect. I highly doubt that they would put a ALPR in the area of the service road like this, especially because it is so close to the entrance of what looks like a drive through. Please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at the position of this ALPR on several aerial imagery sources in iD it seems incorrect. I highly doubt that they would put a ALPR in the area of the service road like this, especially because it is so close to the entrance of what looks like a drive through. Please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at the position of this ALPR on several aerial imagery sources in iD it seems incorrect. I highly doubt that they would put a ALPR in the area of the service road like this, especially because it is so close to the entrance of what looks like a drive through. Please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at the position of this ALPR on several aerial imagery sources in iD it seems incorrect. I highly doubt that they would put a ALPR in the area of the service road like this, especially because it is so close to the entrance of what looks like a drive through. Please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

From the get go, I am not saying this is incorrect, but it seems like adding leisure=stadium to relation 20585093 duplicates the tag as there is already a way (an area) with that tag that has the same shape as the outer of the relation (the way is way/1300303135). I have linked direct links to objects on the OSM website below
- relation/20585093
- way/1300303135

Happy mapping,
Udar.

what it your source for the addition of these pitches?
I doubt that they remain in their old shape from the Bing aerial imagery. I say this because the Esri aerial imagery is more up to date in the area and it shows the old racquetball courts having been demolished for the construction that occurred at this park last year. Based on information from the parks website it seems like the construction has completed, but it is also clear that that has replaced the old racquetball courts does not seem to have the same shape (seemingly it is pickleball courts).

Happy mapping,
Udar.