OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
181642663

Yes - same shape is easy. Thanks for adding the levels.

181642663

One such discussion: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/82409/indoor-mapping-mapping-a-shop-in-a-mall-that-extends-over-more-than-one-level/

181642663

If you try to add overlapping ways to a relation it complains (I've tried!). There are a lot of discussions about this on various forums and I've found no better way to do this than to map the floors and have a single node to tag the shop. But I'm very willing to change this if you can find a good alternative.

179101993

Meant to link to the note.
note/4776532

177217140

Will do. Thanks.

161470070

The website does say it has an accessible toilet
https://www.socialpubandkitchen.co.uk/earl-of-camden

161470070

No, sorry. The way has always had wheelchair=yes. But the node had wheelchair=no. I think this will need a survey.

172063630

I don't - but one of the edits was done by @wheelmap_visitor to say that wheelchair=yes (changeset/96668153) so I think that is likely to be correct. I'll update.

167390510

Thanks - just wondering how many other shopping malls I've done this in!

167390510

Hopefully I've removed all the building tags now.

167390510

Thanks for pointing that out - when I've been updating shops to vacant, I've just removed all the obvious redundant tags and changed the shop to vacant. I hadn't noticed that this automatically also adds building=yes.

170581745

Found it.
https://uk.representclo.com/pages/represent-retail-store-manchester

170581745

Thanks - I've just updated but looking again at the photo, I think there is an RES in the middle of the name?

148364024

Just a note to point out that disused:shop was left as a tag when this hairdresser was added. I'm removing it.

162178108

Thanks - fixed in changeset/162182789

157589960

Thanks - have sent an email to the FSA to point out that the address seems to be wrong.

152946238

Thanks for letting me know.

151734305

Thanks - when I started tagging I asked which was preferred, old_name or was:name and I was told that using either would be fine so I've chosen to use old_name. This page seems to say that most people prefer old_name over was:name:
old_name=*

144484235

Thanks. Sorry, I'm trying to just add notes where I think things have closed or changed owner to ask people to check. I'm not quite sure why I decided to edit this one instead of adding a note. I'll revert the changeset and add a note.

144662738

Thanks - I added it to the way because I looked at the history and that was previously tagged as Wilko way/538847858/history

I think the wikidata page just needs updating with the new owner. They have bought the name, website and have access to the social media of the old company. The facebook page is a continuation of the old page and says "We're back!". I'm not sure what the benefit is of using new tags.