Hello Satisfação,

please make sure to only map the actual legal speed limits, not the speeds at which people usually drive on roads.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder,
On behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group

Reverted vandalism

changeset/184908933

Please be aware that you've unknowingly engaged in an edit war here. Your fixing of the phone number formatting is absolutely correct, but maybe consider implementing some sort of detection for this kind of thing.

changeset/184414334
node/13931968501/history

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

Please see: osm.org/user_blocks/20854

You've edited some of these objects dozens of times in the last few days. Most of these didn't even do anything to this object.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap

I see you're interested in adding MTB tracks in this area. If you are interested in really mapping these trails in as much detail as possible, then you might want to read the wiki page on MTB tagging. It contains a lot of very useful additional information:

osm.wiki/Mountain_biking

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap

I see you're interested in adding MTB tracks in this area. If you are interested in really mapping these trails in as much detail as possible, then you might want to read the wiki page on MTB tagging. It contains a lot of very useful additional information:

osm.wiki/Mountain_biking

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

Zie: osm.org/user_blocks/20845

Zie osm.org/user_blocks/20835

Hi,

What exactly does this route represent? The shape doesn't really make much sense to me, and you've not added any details beyond `route=road + type=route`? and this relation spans multiple different roads.

Here you also added the obviously incorrect name of 'qqqqqqqqqqq'. What are you trying to do?

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

Hi,

What exactly does this route represent? The shape doesn't really make much sense to me, and you've not added any details beyond `route=road + type=route`? I'm also wondering why you added the name 'qqqqqq' here before deleting it?

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

All changesets reverted in changeset/184005614

Blocked in osm.org/user_blocks/20798

Reverted in changeset/183967248

All edits have been reverted in: changeset/183966602

Please see: osm.org/user_blocks/20797

The following changesets have been reverted:

183966505, 183966447, 183966411, 183966393, 183966365, 183966335, 183966312, 183966290, 183966272, 183966218, 183966171, 183966132, 183966120, 183966068, 183965976, 183965950, 183965901, 183965879, 183965805, 183965773, 183965703, 183965674, 183965555, 183965474, 183965396, 183965372, 183965344, 183965316, 183965306, 183965278, 183965250, 183965222, 183965205, 183965132, 183965076, 183965053, 183965012, 183964998, 183964839, 183964827, 183964707, 183964498, 183964427, 183964411, 183964394, 183964364, 183964338, 183964329, 183964302, 183964250, 183964143, 183964082, 183964053, 183964039, 183963999, 183963588, 183963561, 183963543, 183963537, 183963517, 183963497

Hallo Rubenke,

Bedankt voor de reactie.

Jij doet veel meer dan alleen wat dingen fixen. Jij verwijderd hier grote hoeveelheden data van iemand anders om wat mij meer een verschil in mapping stijl lijkt te zijn.

Routing kun je ook fixen zonder massaal data te verwijderen. Wat de één onbangrijke details vindt, is voor een ander mischien wel belangrijk.

Als de kwaliteit van de data te laag is, of als een mapper systematische fouten maakt, dan is het altijd beter dit eerst te proberen op te lossen via changeset of forum discussies. De eerste stap is niet alle data verwijderen.

Ik wil jou vragen om niet zomaar dit soort details massaal te verwijderen zonder dit eerst met de oorspronkelijke mapper te discusseren of zonder dat hier een duidelijk community consensus voor bestaat.

Vriendelijke groet,
Taya Snijder,
OSMF Data Working Group

Hallo Rubenke,

Zou je kunnen uitleggen waarom je in deze changeset en in vele anderen, alleen maar objecten verwijderd met de onduidelijke beschrijving 'fix'? Als ik zo kijk dan lijkt de data gewoon te kloppen.

Vriendelijke groet,
Taya Snijder,
OSMF Data Working Group

Reverted in changeset/183914698

Hello,

you seem to have hundreds of changesets, all changing buildings to `building=construction`. Are you sure this is correct? Are all this building currently under construction?

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

Hello,

osm.org/user_blocks/20779
Given your previous block, could you explain why you added a village with zero people here in the middle of the water?

Best regards,
Taya Snijder,
On behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group