SomeoneElse's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by SomeoneElse
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 296559 | SomeoneElse | There are two farms named "Butterley Farm" here (to the southwest and northeast). Both have been tagged based on signage, but need to recheck because of the obvious duplication. |
|||
| 297582 | SomeoneElse | What time does this open? A recent changeset comment says that the cafe at node/3230697001 is open every day until 14:00, but when does it open? Does it open 7 days a week? |
|||
| 298047 | SomeoneElse | There are some duplicate "localities" here node/2899977546 and node/2899955722 are both allegedly "Caythorpe Low Fields". To the east are node/2899955724 and node/2899955725, allegedly "Fulbeck Low Fields". In reality I suspect both of these places (if they exist at all on the modern world) are areas rather than point locations, and the mapper has just copied text from OS_OpenData_StreetView without thinking at all about what it represents. |
|||
| 298048 | SomeoneElse | I'm not convinced that the farmland to the west of the ridge such as way/319041308 is really "meadow". When I was last there it just looked like part of the rest of the local farmland (some arable, some with animals on it). |
|||
| 299164 | SomeoneElse | Is way/315901396 really a river? As mapped it seems to flow uphill into the village, around, and then down again, which is surely wrong. |
|||
| 299227 | SomeoneElse | Landuse needs surveying properly. My recollection is there there are no meadows around Leadenham - it's just regular agricultural land (mostly arable, some grazing). |
|||
| 301061 | SomeoneElse | The Bing imagery here is currently offset to the south by 5m or so, and unfortunately this does not seem to be have been taken into account by recent "non-surveying" mappers. Things need shuffling north to match reality (the actual amount varies by location). |
|||
| 301069 | SomeoneElse | Check for any signage that might justify the name of way/40961536 as current. I suspect there won't be any - if there isn't any evidence for the name it should be removed. |
|||
| 8684 | SomeoneElse | Is this path really called this? It looks more like a description than a ame. |
|||
| 301070 | SomeoneElse | The imagery suggests that way/316741487 should be abandoned rather than disused - is it possible to check properly from the footpath to the south, or does the relative level of the path and rail line make this impossible? |