As drawn, this footpath is clearly rubbish. I suspect that from the west it actually joins the stub to the northeast of here, rather than connecting to the wrong side of the bridge.

Need to have a look to see how the (mostly artificial?) north-south channel interacts with the natural east-west streams. Does it act as some sort of load balancer, or a feeder for something else?

Presumably this footpath joins the main road, but does it go right past the pub or into the car park first?

Presumably the footpath from the south here joins the path to the north of it? You can't see from the imagery because of tree cover, but it seems pretty likely.

way/24512612#map=19/53.42937/-1.98834&layers=N needs a survey southwest from here to see exactly how it joins. The paths southeast and northwest I've aligned from GPS traces, but way/24512612 doesn't obviously match a ground feature and there are no underlying traces.

Is there really a disused rail line north of here (that then forks both east and west). It's possible, but somewhat unlikely - needs a proper survey.

There are some untagged and some duplicate features here (try osm.org/#map=19/27.15017/87.24251&layers=ND to see them). What are they and what should they be tagged as?

There's some sort of farm shoppy thing in one of these two buildings. What exactly is it and what is it called?

The bridleways south of here partially duplicate the existing service road. Are they signed "public bridleway"? If so remove the parts of the new bridleways where they duplicate the service roads and add "designation=public_bridleway" to the appropriate parts of the service roads.

Here way/316657178 seems to be a duplicate of part of way/316528733 , which is surely wrong.

Also the "motorroad=yes" tag seems unlikely in Nepal (even if highway=primary is valid in this mountainous region, which seems unlikely).