It's a low-quality import by a French engineering school. Some of the replies you can see at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2504387 explain what they were trying to do (6 years ago).
I don't know if it was just a process failure (the actual source data was sound; they just imported it multiple times) or whether the source data itself was a problem.

Oops, it looks like the hotel's website http://web.archive.org/web/20170826133157/http://www.tinto-house.co.uk/ expired and got replaced with a parking page. You've updated the parking page to https :)

(all ones that I'd mapped)

From survey 18/09/2022, tr9225b

Thanks. I did wonder about that, but that change was before the latest round of vandalism, made on 2022-01-26 ,

Thanks for fixing it.

Hola escalibur23,
Por favor, no agregue cosas a OpenStreetMap que no existen -
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127168840 Parece muy poco probable.
Saludos,
Andy

Hello escalibur23,
Please don't add things to OpenStreetMap that don't exist -
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127168840 Looks very unlikely.
Best Regards,
Andy

Utilice mejores comentarios de conjunto de cambios que "Corrección de errores".

Please use better changeset comments than "Corrección de errores ".

Hola,
Parece haber una discusión sobre el mapeo de https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/1909536892. ¿Puedes explicar por qué crees que estás en lo correcto?
Saludos,
Andy Townsend, en representación del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM.

Hola,
Parece haber una discusión sobre el mapeo de https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/1909536892. ¿Puedes explicar por qué crees que estás en lo correcto?
Saludos,
Andy Townsend, en representación del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM.

Hello,
There seems to be an argument over the mapping of https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/1909536892 . Can you please explain why you think you are correct?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Hello,
There seems to be an argument over the mapping of https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/1909536892 . Can you please explain why you think you are correct?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Does node/10068300342 really count as a place=city here?

Hello,
Please don't add large rough features like https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mno . It doesn't add any value to OSM at all to do this.
Best Regards,
Andy

Well, "... of a path" would help! I was looking at this and seeing the odd chain of peaks and the ridge way/1088791297 and thought it might be related to that.

Hello kate_rocketdata,
There is no mention of Ukraine at osm.wiki/Rocketdata_import or osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Rocketdata.io . Was this edit made in error?
Best Regards,
Andy (from the DWG)

Hello Bravo Mapper,
In osm.org/user_blocks/6369 you were asked to "use good changeset comments. Describe the changes that you are making". In this example, "segment added" is not a good changeset comment.
What actually is it that you have added here?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello Bravo Mapper,
Please don't add test data to OpenStreetMap like this.
If you need a test server you can create an account at https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/
Best Regards,
Andy

Wikipedia has different rules for inclusion compared to OSM (it allows fictional things, for example, and OSM doesn't). Wikipedia used to have two separate articles but they got merged (I would say in error; but I have no influence over wikipedia)

Whether there should be a "place=locality" here called "Null Island" is an interesting question; I've argued against that in the past (and probably still would, on the grounds that it's a name used in geographical circles but not in the wider population). However, people have suggested that it is widely known enough to be worth including as a locality in OSM (including at least one member of the board!) so my view isn't universal. Some of the previous changesets at https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/3815077900 have comments on them, and there was quite a long thread at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2022-January/thread.html#87164 as well.