SomeoneElse's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 117824756 | Nun Monkton not Notton |
|
| 117594125 | Perhaps Langthwaite not Langthorne? |
|
| 118199008 | The name on this one make sense - maybe this might help explain the limits of the "off by one" (or whatever it was) error? |
|
| 118569613 | Likely Grimston not Great Smeaton |
|
| 117584253 | Westerdale not West Witton |
|
| 119088267 | I've found https://www.yorkshirewater.com/media/sxnfahsl/market-information-publication.xlsx and that lists this as Kelfield, not Keld.
|
|
| 118501311 | I suspect they've cocked up the production of whatever data you used.
|
|
| 119087457 | Long Marston not Lofthouse |
|
| 119087608 | Ryther not Ruston Parva |
|
| 119088267 | Kelfield not Keld |
|
| 119088531 | Wistow not Whitley |
|
| 117818114 | Likely Nunburnholme not Nun Monkton |
|
| 118792307 | Likely Crambe not Crakehall |
|
| 118501311 | Aldwark, not Aldfield STW, surely? |
|
| 118501853 | Flaxton not Flawith, surely? |
|
| 125499349 | ok, when did you survey it then? |
|
| 125499349 | It is not possible to "licence wash" data like that. Where did you obtain the data from and under what licence? Who or what is "LocationCapture By ATXLDN"? |
|
| 125499349 | Under what licence is the housenumber data for e.g. node/440214686 released? |
|
| 125465187 | No, I'm afraid you really don't yet. |
|
| 125465187 | Please learn how things are mapped in OSM before making statements like that. |