OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
117413424

The discussion on talk-gb seemed to suggest that in this particular case these _are_ signed as cycleways, no matter how bonkers that sign placement actually is, so "cycleway" is actually correct here.

118125842

J'ai suggéré à la personne qui s'est plainte au DWG qu'il serait bon qu'elle essaie de contacter ce mappeur, mais elle ne l'a pas fait.
Malgré cela, les données semblent assez improbables, je vais donc les supprimer.

118125842

I did suggest that the person who complained to the DWG that it would be good if they tried to contact this mapper, but they didn't.
Notwithstanding that, the data looks pretty unlikely, so I'll remove it.

54544551

Hello timmmichaud,

Andy from the DWG here. We've been told that some paths that you've added here such as
way/546139489 are actually private (and I note that way/546139477/history , which we also had a complaint about, was actually changed to private a couple of years ago). See changeset/118124907 . Do you believe that these paths are _not_ private, and if so, can you please contact the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org ? Please include "
Re: [Ticket#2022030410000025]" in the email subject.

74090335

Hello,
Can you explain a bit more about the "We have travelers" part? Are these people working for your company, or something else?
Best Regards,
Andy

117622405

هلا،
هل يمكن أن تشرح لماذا تعتقد أن كل شيء على الطريق السريع؟
أنا في حاجة إليها،
آندي

117622405

Hello,
Your comment here translates as "Tunnel of life and beautiful I hope a lot". Can you explain why you think that it is all motorway?
Best Regards,
Andy

101715069

I've metioned the deletion of this in changeset/117922060

117922060

Hello,
Just wondered if the deletion of the EDs inc relation/12490411 was deliberate?
Best Regards,
Andy

101514061

Ce stade et la "piscine olympique de saint-michel" ici paraissent improbables ; si personne ne répond dans quelques jours, je les supprimerai.

117985337

Great - thanks!
I thought it was odd that these roads would be "too busy"...

117985337

Does NCN66 really stop and restart here? It used to do this: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gxH and now it does this: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gxI .
Is it one of the gaps that have been introduced as part of the "Paths for everyone" initiative? Logically I'd have expected it to use the old railway here, TBH...

117752030

A revert of where _only_ osmose was used was started in changeset/117961003 and is ongoing.
Max_Kritic is currently blocked from the API for a short time in osm.org/user_blocks/5727 for ignoring requests not to use _only_ osmose.

116871181

Oddly https://tile.openstreetmap.fr doesn't add the lines on these ones - you'd need to ask the maintainers of that what the actual rules are.

117752030

> Des corrections diverses que proposent avec Osmose.

Ce n'est pas correct. Osmose ne fait que des suggestions. Vous devez vérifier chacun d'eux à la fois pour vous assurer que ce qui est suggéré est valide. Je vois régulièrement des suggestions d'Osmose lors de l'édition avec Vespucci, et un pourcentage élevé d'entre elles (30 à 50 % localement ?) Sont des faux positifs.

Je vais devoir les annuler car nous savons déjà que vous avez commis des erreurs de base en matière de changement de langue. Si vous pouvez être plus précis sur les modifications apportées à quels ensembles de modifications, je pourrai peut-être en exclure certaines du retour.

- Andy (du DWG)

117752030

> Des corrections diverses que propose avec Osmose.

This is not OK. Osmose only makes suggestions. You need to check each one one at a time to make sure that what is being suggested is valid. I regularly see Osmose suggestions when editing with Vespucci, and a high percentage of those (30-50% locally?) are false positives.

I'll have to revert these since we already know that there were some basic language change errors made by you as a result. If you can be more specific about what changes were made in what changesets then perhaps I may be able to exclude some from the revert.

- Andy (from the DWG)

117863557

I suspect that you added the ways, and the relation, and then added _everything_ to the relation (rather than just the ways).
Everyone does that at least once :)
I'll have a look in more detail later.
I also mentioned it at https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH/p1645956747743569 (which you can get to via https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ if not already there), so someone may beat me to fixing it.

114096499

Hello,
Please don't add test data to OSM like this.
Best Regards,
Andy

110659593

Hello,
Please don't add test data to OpenStreetMap like this!
Best Regards,
Andy

114444993

Hello,
I'm not sure what happened here, but you added some things in the middle of the Atlantic:
node/9300376426/history
Best Regards,
Andy