Well, you've got a choice - there are 3 options available from the "edit" menu at the top of the screen. Maybe try one of the others?

Thanks.
You didn't draw the building but you did attach the fence to one of its nodes and drag it a bit node/1188014435/history . That node has been dragged to the right a bit, but I suspect the fence shouldn't be connected to the building at all.
Cheers,
Andy

Hi,
Both of these seem to be duplicates of the pagoda to the north, already mapped.
Best Regards,
Andy
မင်္ဂလာပါ,
ဤနှစ်ဦးစလုံးပြီးသားတစ်ခုသို့ဆက်စပ်မြောက်ဘက်ဘုရား၏မိတ္တူများကို, ဖြစ်ဟန်။
လေးစားစွာဖြင့်,
အန်ဒီ

Hello,
The Royal Hospital is already mapped across the road at node/4387192694 .
Best Regards,
Andy
ဟလို,
တော်ဝင်ဆေးရုံပြီးသား node/4387192694 မှာလမ်းတစ်လျှောက်တစ်ခုသို့ဆက်စပ်နေပါတယ်။
လေးစားစွာဖြင့်,
အန်ဒီ

That makes sense I think. Where I live the OS has 5 "names" for hamlets / villages which I've simply never heard used any time in the last 30 years - unfortunately some things on OS maps simply aren't as trustworthy as others, and the myriad "small names" of localities, farms etc. are one of those issues.

Around here (and indeed elsewhere), a named road doesn't imply council maintained or owned. It just means the OS knows about it and has a (possibly historic) name from somewhere. There are some even worse examples in Sherwood Forest where a "road" (according to the OS) doesn't exist at all any more.
This one's actually labelled as a public bridleway, but there are plenty of other examples where there may or may not be a name, and there's some sort of right of way (not necessarily vehicular) but no-one's quite sure what. These are getting picked up, as the CROW act deadline of 2026 approaches, but there are still quite a few left.

One of the Edinburgh locals will have more info, but the current road state looks like it mirrors the work being done to support the (as yet unopened) new bridge, and the imagery looks like the old road state before any of the work started.

Hello and welcome to OSM!
You may not be aware, but when you edit OpenStreetMap you're editing a map that everyone can see, not just your personal copy. Please do continue editing, but please do only add things that are verifiable on the ground, not things like node/4412721199 . If you want to add a personal bookmark to MAPS.ME you can - just select the thing that you want to bookmark, select "save" and then "edit bookmark".
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
You've added node/4402566692 without a "name". You'll need to use a proper editor to do this because MAPS.ME does not let you add names. Please us a PC web browser and edit the map from there. Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy
Ciao,
Hai aggiunto node/4402566692 senza un "nome". Avrete bisogno di utilizzare un editor proprio di fare questo perché MAPS.ME non consente di aggiungere i nomi. noi prego un browser PC e modificare la mappa da lì. Tutte le domande, non esitate a chiedere.
I migliori saluti,
Andy

Is there really an ATM here? It seems a very unlikely location.
ငွေထုတ်စက်ကဒီမှာတကယ်ရှိပါသလား? ဒါဟာအလွန်မဖြစ်နိုင်တည်နေရာပုံရသည်။
难道真有自动取款机吗？这似乎是一个不太可能的位置。

Changeset discussion comment (to previous changing user) written to changeset/42450861 in English and auto-translated French.

Hello,
As you may or may not be aware, the changes to the borders of Spain / Morocco / Western Sahara have been made following community consultation. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 for more details. I've returned the boundaries back to the results of the community consensus - please do not attempt to undo this. If you'd like to contact the Data Working Group you can do so by email to data@osmfoundation.org .
In addition, can I please ask you to use changeset comments that are more meaningful than "Mise à jour des données"? That doesn't explain what you did and why. You've also used a "source=survey" tag on the changeset which I suspect may be misplaced here.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
(traduction automatique)
Bonjour,
Comme vous pouvez ou ne pas être au courant, les changements aux frontières de l'Espagne / Maroc / Sahara Occidental ont été faites après consultation de la communauté. Voir http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 pour plus de détails. Je suis retourné les limites de retour aux résultats du consensus communautaire - s'il vous plaît ne pas tenter d'annuler cette. Si vous souhaitez contacter le Groupe de travail de données, vous pouvez le faire par courriel à data@osmfoundation.org.
De plus, je peux s'il vous plaît vous demander d'utiliser commentaires des changements qui sont plus significatives que "Mise à jour des données"? Cela n'explique pas ce que vous avez fait et pourquoi. Vous avez également utilisé une "source = enquête" tag sur le changeset que je soupçonne peut être déplacée ici.

Meilleures salutations,

Andy Townsend, au nom du groupe de travail des données de l'OSM

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Unfortunately, something went wrong here - you managed to change the whole island into "jet view". It's not your fault - there's a problem with the app that you've been given to map the island (I've already been talking to Colleen about that). Please don't use it for mapping until the problems are fixed.
If you've got any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch, either with me directly through OSM, or with the Data Working Group via data@osmfoundation.org .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Great - thanks. That should prevent people getting confused.

Thanks. Does way/224093210/history need an "access=no" tag on it (or even deleting until the works are complete)?

Hello, is way/46342371/history signed as a public bridleway? If so, adding the tag "designation=public_bridleway" will make it clear what the legal status is.
Also, if it's wide enough for 4-wheeled traffic (e.g. tractors) then it should really be a "highway=track" rather than a "highway=bridleway". The imagery suggests that at least the western part of this way is - it's not clear about the eastern part (unfortunately although I've walked north and south through Rudyard many times I've never been this far west, so can't offer my personal recollection).
Hope you don't mind me mentioning this, just trying to help. Any questions please don't hesitate to ask.
Andy

Hello,
I don't quite understand why, if Beaconsfield Street is no longer accessible you've just removed the name?
Is way/224093210/history still a cycleway? Can you walk along it? Is it still actually still called Beaconsfield Street?
Hope you don't mind me asking - just trying to help.
Cheers,
Andy

Hello,
The building way/102871604 now has a fence way/409016734 running through it. Should the fence actually be to the east a bit, and should the building really be such a funny shape?
Regards,
Andy

It's just spam; I'd delete it.

Thanks - note added note/725821 .