adjacent to Tyne Tunnel - tidying up after changeset/110823595#map=4/62.07/12.06&layers=H revert.

Apologies for the " changeset revert grossness" - unfortunately the mapper concerned had copied data from Google StreetView, which means that we don't have a choice but to revert and redact that information.
Thanks for tidying this section up - I'm currently about 80% through the list of revert fails that caused the duplication that you've fixed here.
- Andy, from the Data Working Group.

Tanks for tidying these up. I'm about 70% of the list of revert errors currently...

Tidying up after changeset/110823595#map=4/62.07/12.06&layers=H revert

Oops - I think that this (or maybe an edit previous to yours?) might have left some gaps in relation/10601794 . I've filled them in now.

Thanks - and thanks for fixing e.g. way/965846677 .

... and ignore my 2 streetcomplete edits to it!

way/965846674#map=19/53.96218/-1.06914

Looks very wrong here - a nonexistent duplicate cycleway.
I suspect you'll want to use overpass to look at the state when there was only one cycleway, look at what duplicated it (perhaps someone added a cycleway tag in error to the former railway here) and correct that error, rather than introducing another one.

I suspect that the duplication might have been done by someone new to osm, and might need a friendly "hello and welcome" message as well

If you can do that before doing any other mapping that'd be great.

> Is there anywhere that also states banned sources?

There is no "list of banned sources" since that is the wrong way around - we can only use sources whose licences explicitly allow us to.

Google is explicitly mentioned at osm.wiki/Legal_FAQ#Can_I_trace_data_from_Google_Maps.2FNokia_Maps.2F....3F

I can't think of a really easy way beyond simply navigating through them at osm.org - osm.wiki/Quality_assurance has some, and in addition to those in with osm.wiki/Revert_scripts is a "download all changesets by a user" script (but you'd need to use something else to process/visualise them).

> I would have to go back through all 2,000 of my edits to try and locate maybe like 30 edits?

If you have only used Google on some edits then yes, it will make sense to let us know on which edits that was. If you don't we'll have to assume that all previous edits are affected.

Sure, but we'll need to know which edits you used Google Street View for _at all_ .

> Hi, the sources I use are mainly Google Street View

For the avoidance of doubt - we can't use Google Street View or other Google products as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here.

Can you let us know which changesets of yours have relied on Google as a source? We'll need to revert/redact those changes. You can comment here or email data@osmfoundation.org .

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

I've added a zero_waste=yes tag to The Scoop Wholefoods (based on name and website). zero_waste=only may be more correct; maybe you know one way or the other?

I've added a zero_waste=yes tag to The Refill Larder (based on name and website). zero_waste=only may be more correct; perhaps you know whether that would be the case?

Also added website to "Scoop Wholefoods"

I've added a zero_waste=yes tag to Refill Therapy (based on https://www.govserv.org/GB/London-Borough-of-Hackney/139960572707734/Greener-Hackney). zero_waste=only may be more correct; maybe you know?

I've added a zero_waste=yes tag to "Refill And Go" (based on the name and the website). zero_waste=only may be more correct; not sure if you're a shopper there?

Hello DuhC0mmunity,
Please use changeset comments that explain what you're changing rather than just ".". This was mentioned before at changeset/107719914 - please do explain what each change is.
Best Regards,
Andy