I've removed the name here for the same reason as changeset/106863408 .

Hello Botogav,
Here you've changed the name of a road to "Donald J. Trump State Senic Highway". Maybe this was a satirical comment about supporters of the former reality TV host (among other jobs) not being able to spell, but unfortunately for the joke OpenStreetMap is a map of the world as it really exists, not as we might like it to. You'll have noticed that it got changed to a more plausible name pretty quickly: http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=10981421 .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
The edit to way/942442156/history lost the historical name here - see http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=777762683 and https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/194L . I've restored back to previous data.
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks for fixing lanes on http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=77518539 , but the maxspeed was left wrong. Looking at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/194K you can see where the previous 80 limit was.

Hello,
It looks like something went a bit wrong here with http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=766376382 - the name was "R510;Warmbad␣Road".
I've reverted back to the previous state.
Best Regards,
Andy

Something had gone a bit wrong here; http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=742719239 had lanes=2;3 on it. I've reverted back to the previous state.

way/953674156 was created here with "maxspeed=100;80". I've reverted back to the previous state.

Also way/953645603

way/953645602 was created here with "maxspeed=100;120". I'll revert back to the previous state.

For info, way/953647533/history was created with "maxspeed=80;60". I've reverted back to the problem merge at osm.org/browse/changeset/102972116 .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Thanks for fixing the lane tags here, but not the maxspeed. I've reverted back to before the merge in 103388263. Hopefully everything still looks connected.
Best Regards,
Andy

> But name: tag has to be in Azerbaijani language.

Not necessarily - the relevant language for the "name" tag will be the one most used by people who live in the immediate area. If you can link to evidence that that's changed from pre-2020 then please do so.

I've restored these in changeset/107276459 , and also squared them up by pressing "q" before uploading.

I'm more than happy to undo changes where they were valid - but as I said on changeset/107272257 your deletion of valid entries elsewhere cast doubt on all your changes.

(to reply to an OSM PM received by me from İsmət_S) you're welcome to continue mapping things in OSM but it's not OK to make arbitary changes that reflect one side of a political dispute but not the situation on the ground. For example, if you believe that the local population's language justifies your changes to http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=10316068 in osm.org/browse/changeset/106983044 then please explain that in the changeset comment - but I can't imagine a reason to justify the removal of the name:hy altogether.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
The policy that governs how disputed areas are represented in OSM can be seen at https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf (see "The OpenStreetMap community operates under the “on the ground” principle" etc.). The "name" tag of places within a country don't necessarily match the main language used within a country (for the avoidance of doubt - relation/2374762 , which you deleted in changeset/106917429 , was always shown as a disputed area (admin_level=3) within the country (admin_level=2) of Azerbaijan.
Best Regards,
Andy

I've scanned the ways in here that aren't deletes, and although 209141784 was in error the others mostly look like improvements. The relation changes here do revert vandalism.

Hello İsmət_S,
Can you explain why you removed name:hy from relation/11905748 here?
Also, please always use good changeset comments. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Can you explain why you deleted relation/2374762 here?
Best Regards,
Andy

When I was last there there wasn't much signage on this section and to the Major Oak; though I haven't checked for some time.