SomeoneElse's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 40052314 | Sorry aboyt the "reverted" message above - I don't believe that anything in here has actually been reverted. |
|
| 40682272 | Hello,
|
|
| 40660522 | Hello,
|
|
| 40559095 | Hello,
|
|
| 13486473 | Hi,
|
|
| 40612462 | For info, "trolltags" might need some explanation (it's not as offensive as it sounds): |
|
| 40051763 | Thanks aaronsta - I'll compare that list to what I previously had to make sure that I don't revert something that I shouldn't. |
|
| 40694702 | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
|
|
| 40627715 | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
|
|
| 40542909 | Oops - this changeset seemed to cross the Atlantic. What actually was the problem at Barlby (since you changed neither way there)? |
|
| 40661108 | Thanks. I've also rejoined way/106343718/history to the cycleway again (it had become disconnected). I presume the new access road to the car park is actually open now. Have you been here recently? |
|
| 40706723 | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
|
|
| 40051763 | @aaronsta Thanks for the info. We probably ought to try and warn people not to create changesets "so big that you can't download them afterwards" (and somewhere in the wiki we may do already, but I'm not aware of it).
|
|
| 40671534 | Hi,
|
|
| 40051763 | @mueschel The Data Working Group's aware of this changeset and the need to remove the data that it introduced. Unfortunately the technicalities of doing so aren't quite so straightforward (an normal API download fails) so we're investigating the options.
|
|
| 40663970 | Sounds a bit like one of Lincolnshire's "Unclassified County Roads". "designation=adopted_highway" sounds like a good answer to me (I'll stick a line in at https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L151 to deal with it!) |
|
| 40651735 | Hello,
|
|
| 40663970 | Got any thoughts on whether way/25825505/history should really be an unclassified road? I thought not, and said so on changeset/38625785 and note/566042 . @pmailkeey thought not, but they're currently blocked and may have left the project. I was about to just change it back, but noticed you've just edited it and so there have probably been there more recently than me. |
|
| 40659668 | Thanks for that - I went looking for this today to correct the tagging but taginfo couldn't find it! |
|
| 40618864 | Hello, is the website here correct? It looks just like the generic NTS one. |