OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
51950795

Hello xinduqiao,
Can you explain what boundary changes you made here and what the source was?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

51913438

Hi,
Is the definitely a deli (as per shop=deli?uselang=en-GB ) rather than the usual sandwich / other fresh food place? It's a while since I've walked past the door (it's a long way uphill from most of Matlock) but my recollection was more Sandwich-y?
Best Regards,
Andy

51872228

Hello kr_maps and welcome to OSM!
I already had a go at adding ESC to OSM as node/3800676729 . Maybe that didn't show up in OsmAnd? Not sure about the best tag though - it's not really a shop, and "adult gaming centre" usually used for gambling arcades.
Cheers,
Andy

51697271

For clarity re "When travelling, I expect to be able to tap on a phone number and for it to work, without me having to enter the country code at that time", you can. If you're roaming on another country's network you can just dial local numbers with no country code, just as if you were dialling from a local landline.

51848903

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
This is just a quick note to let you know, in case you're not already aware that the Morrocan border here is one of the more "sensitive" ones in OSM - there have been politically motivated attempts to change the borders of Morocco in the past to include e.g. Spanish territory in the north and area of former Western Sahara south of the "berm" in the south.

There are essentially two sets of borders here - there's a straight line (the old Mauritania / Western Sahara border) and a wiggly one (the "Moroccan Wall" or "berm") - a fortification created by the Morrocan army in former Western Sahara, with them on one side of it and the Polisario Front on the other. If you look at the imagery underneath way/198749099#map=15/21.3391/-15.2639 you can se the fortifications fairly clearly - sometimes that line is north of the old Mauritania border and sometimes south.
You've made this change with a comment of "fixing" here. Perhaps you could explain here in a bit more detail what you were trying to change?
Here's a link about previous discussion about this https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=602864#p602864 .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

46523754

@KDDA - there are only 2 bits called "Tyrone / Fermanagh" left - way/490542618 and way/369383412/history - it's probably easiest just to change them manually.

51819371

你好极了,欢迎来到OpenStreetMap,
您已经更改了边界标记
relation/3964691/历史从争议到行政。 你能解释一下这个变化的原因吗?
最好的祝福,
Andy Townsend,代表OSM的数据工作组。

51819371

Hello Ultimate lore and welcome to OpenStreetMap,
You've changed the boundary tags on
relation/3964691/history from disputed to administrative. Can you please explain the reason for the change?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

11941060

Hi,
I think that something has gone wrong with node/486594656/history . The name of that now says Patterdale, and it used to say Aira Force, but I think that Aira Force is correct because that is where it is.
Maybe you accidentally copied data from node/4190436045 ?
Best Regards,
Andy

51754267

Hi,
I don't think I'd describe the former Millers Dale station is any sort of "railway=station". That would suggest to people that they might be able to get a train from there! Previously it was "railway=station_site" which is not ideal, but at least it isn't misleading!
Maybe something involving "historic" as a modifier would work? taginfo suggests a few options: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=station_site#values .
Cheers,
Andy

51757003

您好,欢迎来到OpenStreetMap!
你已经改变了这里的一些国际边界,似乎造成了一些问题。 你能解释一下你想改变什么吗?
我们在OpenStreetMap中映射边框的方式在http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf中有描述。
最好的祝福,
Andy Townsend,代表OSM的数据工作组

51757003

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've made a change to some International borders here that seems to have caused some problems. Can you explain what you were trying to change?
The way that we map borders in OpenStreetMap is described at http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

51735645

Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy

51715880

Oops - wrong account - should have been "SomeoneElse_Revert". The "note" here "VERY UNFINISHED NEEDS REFINING TTO WALL LINES etc" was added by a previous mapper of the Heathland here and it's actually considerably _more_ finished than the series reverted in N Wales. There's still room for improvement (and the waterways are still ex-NPE)

51698005

I stayed at De Witte Schuur about 20 years ago - back then it just called itself just "De Witte Schuur" rather than "Zorgboerderij De Witte Schuur", but I guess that might have changed.

51706256

Hi,
Would it be possible to explain what the change was here? "clean up special characters" doesn't really say what was changed and why.
Best Regards,
Andy

51694616

Hi,
Which router is it that requires a "bicycle=yes" on a gate in order to route through it?
Best Regards,
Andy

51682044

Hello TR42,
In changeset/51621108 I tried to explain the problems associated with "colouring in" large swathes as heathland without paying attention to the detail. You're still doing it here - if you look at osm.org/#map=19/52.82126/-3.41370 you can see an apparent "heath" runs through several woodland areas, and right through someone's house. Adding features incorrectly in this way helps no-one. Please take more care when mapping; don't make huge changes that will need lots and lots of work by other mappers to fix. Start small - the imagery here is plenty good enough for there to be no excuse to not do things properly.
Best Regards,
Andy

51665399

Sustrans have the 680 cycle route as the Monsal Trail https://www.sustrans.org.uk/ncn/map/route/route-680. I've not seen that signage, but have seen signage where Sustrans don't have it down in Matlock.

51209528

Hi James,
You may want to revisit some of the deletions in here - the DWG's had to revert the offending duplicates added in changeset/51210673 et al (see the discussion in there which also suggests a possible Google source of the names).
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.