OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
182878354

Hello Pernycek,
Ignoring Google Maps (Which we cannot use) and wikidata (usually likewise, for different reasons), what is your source for your edit here?
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)

182778424

Ah - I see a comment on changeset/182785531 explaining the signage.

182778424

Powiedziałeś „przywróć błędną edycję kierunkową”, ale nie powiedziałeś, skąd to wiesz. Poprzedni redaktor powiedział: „Ulica Lubartowska jest dwukierunkowa na całej swojej długości”.
Bez żadnych konkretnych dowodów skończymy na wojnach edycyjnych w nieskończoność, takich jak https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/230504488.
Proszę, wyjaśnij, dlaczego masz rację, a drugi maper się myli.

182778424

You've said "revert incorrect directionality editing" but have not said how you know that. The previous editor said "Lubartowska Street is two-way along its entire length."
Without any actual evidence we'll end up with edit wars ad infinitum like https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/230504488 .
Please explain why you are right and the other mapper is wrong.

182610353

@Vojtěch Fošnár what is "sync dev"? If you're importing data into OSM you must follow osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines .

170667311

Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here (we've been made aware of this discussion).
Outside the DWG I've spent quite a lot of time looking at what OSM tags are used with what other OSM tags. "attraction=animal" on an animal enclosure within a zoo doesn't usually have a "tourism=attraction" tag.
If you look at the tags that occur with "attraction=animal" https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/attraction=animal#combinations you can see that "tourism=attraction" is used in only a third of cases.
Quite a few of those are "standalone" animal attractions like node/6611980233 , not within zoos at all.
I'd actually suggest the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/ as the best way to discuss this sort of thing.
Best Regards,
Andy

183152268

It looks like this edit broke a couple of cycle routes - see e.g. relation/11017#map=20/57.3458154/-4.0042718 .
Also, is way/37121135 really access=no currently?

183330000

Oops - looks like this broke a bunch of relations such as relation/11064743#map=20/53.3295359/-6.5297889 . I've split the bridge in two where the boundary joined and removed the extra bit from the 15 relations.
Personally I find editing relations in Vespucci very complicated (although the author of Vespucci does not - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/cloning-copying-a-relation-or-route/142949/15 ).
Cheers,
Andy

183229614

Also ts2761a (Walsden 509 bus) and ts2762b (Todmorden)

183148048

Here you say that https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/8692572 is no longer disputed by Morocco. What evidence do you have for that?

183148239

Here you have changed the name of https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/8692572 from a mulitlingual version to just Spanish. Did you discuss that with both the Spanish and Moroccan OSM communities?

183148302

Here you have removed a couple of alt_names from Parsley Island https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/8692572 . Can you explain why?

183148350

Also, what does the changeset comment "lines" mean?

183148350

Hello Muskovian and welcome to OSM.
Can you explain why you deleted relation/9520115/history here?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

183155550

You've got "type=multipolygin" in here.
You could argue that "claimed_by" makes sense, but it is only claimed by one person: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C3%ADt_Jedli%C4%8Dka , not any government.

180911967

Hello,
I've moved the Hertfordshire Way and the other signed paths over to the parallel riverside paths in changeset/183021991 - does that make sense to you?
Best Regards,
Andy

182079192

(no bats involved!)

182079192

For completeness: https://www.mastersofgames.com/rules/bar-billiards-rules.htm :)
It does see to be going through a bit of a revival. I was in the pub when the one at changeset/116037001 was installed.

182459059

Thanks: changeset/182968648

182967742

Hello,
Are you sure that this still exists? The links on changeset/154996123 suggest "missing, presumed sunk".
Best Regards,
Andy