Thanks

As mentioned in changeset/173662814 , it looks like you're still joining landuse to ways again. It really isn't the preferred way of doing things (it's even on the "first level of the #questionableedits iceberg" - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/the-questionable-edits-osm-iceberg/142781 .
This is based on looking at relation/20394070/history#map=14/61.95808/21.81719 and way/1493480918/history#map=19/61.958997/21.805064 .

For the avoidance of doubt, "google maps" isn't an appropriate source, though first party data on a first party website should be.

Cyclists have to go the right way around the roundabout, so the southbound bit needs adding too.

Oops - you also need to complete the cycle route relation/61899#map=18/52.781454/-0.862904 !

Thanks!

It looks like you've deleted the Cotswolds just in time for Easter! :)
Currently it's no longer a valid multipolygon since way/1013226614/history and way/1013226612/history are partial duplications around node/9347863538/history .
I guess that this is a "work in progress" so we'll wait for it to reappear.

Hello,
This defibrillator is in the middle of the Atlantic. Isn't it dangerous yo use one with so much water around :) ?

Just checking - is the gap at relation/4077753#map=19/53.130350/-2.192330 a genuine gap in the path?

There are 174 examples of "locked=yes;no" in the UK, and all of the ones that I've seen so far at NT edits with Vespucci.
The "locked" list is https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ni9 .

Hello, I think that something has gone wrong with node/2346780305 here.
Perhaps you are trying to suggest that there are two gates here? (I only remember one, but it's been a while).
The "barrier" is tagged as "swing_gate;kissing_gate", which nothing will recognise. "locked" is set to "yes;no" (likewise) and "width" to "3.60;1.12" (also likewise).
If there are two barriers here with different widths, it makes more sense to map them as two separate barriers.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
node/13687300383/history
has no recognised OSM tags on it. Can you explain what it is?
Best Regards,
Andy

Alas, you only fixed this one address, not the 100s of other made-up addresses that you added, hence the need for a revert.

The postcode differs from that on the website?

Are you sure that the address of node/13697101302 is correct? Monmore Road is to the east, just south of the dog track: way/73717871 .

For relation/10411148 I'm guessing "Yetholm" rather than "Yeltholm" maybe?
(I know that you didn't originate the name...)

Thanks!

I think you've mangled the operator on way/394544828/history - it doesn't seem valid UTF-8

Hello,
What actually is way/163099441/history ? It was a "planned highway-track" and is now a "proposed railway", but it doesn't connect to anything?
Best Regards,
Andy

Bonjour michel60,

Vous avez incorrectement transformé les terres agricoles à l'adresse way/41809831 en « cour de ferme ». Un simple coup d'œil aux images confirme qu'il s'agit bien de terres agricoles.

Dans ce commentaire, vous avez écrit : « osmose 1310 `building=yes` à l'intérieur de `landuse=farmland` ». OsmOse ne justifie en aucun cas de modifier des données que vous n'avez pas vous-même relevées. Une grande partie de ses indications sont erronées, et cet avertissement en est un exemple.

Veuillez immédiatement rétablir en terres agricoles toutes les cours de ferme que vous avez créées suite à l'avertissement d'OsmOse.

Cordialement,

Andy Townsend, au nom du groupe de travail sur les données d'OSM.