Where "this" is way/139814060 ("Loverose Street"). I can see references on Geograph https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Loverose_Street,_York but suspect that that name has just been copied from Google.
Was the name here actually surveyed?

Hello,
What is the source of the name for this? It doesn't look like it is signed at the war memorial end when I walked past a couple of days ago, and I've never seen signage at the other end.
Best Regards,
Andy

> this illegal route:

What illegal route? The Cyclestreets route that you linked to is suggesting that someone push their bike along the pavement apart from the sections at the very start and end!

Thanks!

Ahem: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/143 ("Hay dualidades" I think).

Just checking - are node/13339241127 and node/13339241129 definitely two different markers and not the same thing? Also, what does node/13339226556 actually look like?
Best Regards,
Andy

Ciao fedc,
Sembra proprio che tu abbia ridisegnato way/27316986/history come way/1483538254. Sarebbe meglio se potessi mantenere la cronologia.

Cordiali saluti,
Andy

Hello fedc,
It does look as if you have redrawn way/27316986/history as way/1483538254 . It would be better if you could keep the history.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Looking at the Kingfisher Way in Arlesey http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1494247 it's still not clear whether it uses the road parallel to the A507 or the footpath?
Best Regards,
Andy

Also ts2526a

None of that changes the fact that replacing "Fix member role." with something that described what you did would be helpful.

What about the northbound signage?

It'd be ever so helpful if the changeset comment was "Fix member role of (way number name or description) in (relation number name or description".

Two points:
a) this is not a "road alignment" change it's an armchair change from unclassified to tertiary
b) based on survey, tertiary is not justified here.
I'll revert this and some others; please discuss any such future changes in the forum on a case by case basis.

Could you perhaps explain a bit more about the change to https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/1305133832 here? "cycle access" doesn't really explain it.
What was the source of your edit?

Regarding the English name, the airport's own website https://sofia-airport.eu/en/about-us/history/ suggests that the English name is "Sofia Airport". Maybe the website was mostly written before the rename, but you'd think that it would get a mention at https://sofia-airport.eu/en/about-us/history/ .
The removal of these names in changeset/178952040 seems silly because airports really _do_ have verifiable names in many languages.
If you can't reach an agreement between yourselves, perhaps try the forum?
Best Regards
Andy (from the DWG)

Reverted in changeset/179769897 . If anyone wants to make a map with this in they can use Overpass and date the query to yesterday.

The Ring of Gullion way had a bit of a gap in it so I filled it in in changeset/179663186
Cheers,
Andy

Thanks for reverting

The car park building is visible under construction from Esri and Mapbox imagery, but was actually completed a couple of years ago. The car park extends west out of the building.

It is unclear how the parking aisle crosses Steeton Brook; my guess is that that is completely covered now (I didn't look).

I saw no indication of any charging suggesting it is free. https://www.yorkshire.com/sutton-in-craven/parking/steeton-silsden also suggests free but council map has a misnamed pay car park located here. Previous OSM status was pay.