Buses indicated as stopped here now stop from ED instead from 20:30 in the evening.

Hello,
A gap seems to have appeared in relation/1216650#map=19/51.050944/0.597351 - presumably way/1464873396 needs to be split in two with the western half added to the relation?

That's a good question - I've not heard of a shopmobility that does sales as well. Searching https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/shop#values for "mobility" finds a few options; "medical_supply" is obviously a bit more generic.

Здравейте,
Можете ли да обясните етикета „cusine“ на node/13192384226? Това е аптека, а не ресторант.
С най-добри пожелания,
Анди

Hello,
Can you explain the "cusine" tag on node/13192384226 ? It is a pharmacy, not a restaurant.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Something (over the period of serveral years, actually) has gone wrong with relation/12890344 . I've patched up what I can, but there's still a gap at the Barbican. A few years ago it did this: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2irU but now there is a gap: relation/12890344#map=19/51.519698/-0.092814 . Where does that route go? Even trying to find a pedestrian route comes up with some silly suggestions: osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=51.5199261%2C-0.092497%3B51.5195382%2C-0.0927787#map=19/51.519813/-0.093170&layers=H .
Best Regards,
Andy

Merhaba,
Buraya eklenen nesnelerin isimlendirilmesini açıklayabilir misiniz? http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=172917036

Saygılarımla,
Andy

Hello,
Can you explain the naming of the objects added here http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=172917036 ?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hallo, könnten Sie bitte genauer erläutern, was Sie hier genau behoben haben? Unter http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=176902709 sehe ich nur Löschungen, keine Korrekturen.
Viele Grüße, Andy

Hello,
Can you explain in more detail what you actually fixed here? If I look at http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=176902709 I only see deletions, not fixes.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Andy from the DWG here again (as also in changeset/139049543 ). The best way of tagging this is "highway=footway; footway=sidewalk". If you do that you don't need to worry about what it is a path for, so you don't need to add an explicit "access=no" tag to stop people driving on it.
Tagging of this sort of thing is being discussed on the UK forum; see e.g. at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-access-no-tagging-of-uk-public-rights-of-way/132798 . I'd definitely suggest putting forward your point of view there.

Thanks!

Thanks - that's fixed it: http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=31640

Thanks!

Thanks!

Thanks - based on that I've sent it to "yes"

Thanks!

Thanks!

I'm guessing that this might be a victim of the pesky "off by 1" error in the spreadsheet - This is allegedly "Micklefield" yet it is very near "Middlesmoor"!

Also a similar thing needs to happen to the Colne Valley Trail relation/12772894#map=17/51.509518/-0.549436 so that that doesn't have a gap in it.