Thanks. Would it be possible to ensure that changesets have some reference to the actual maproulette task? Maproulette tasks tend to be of variable quality, and it's really useful to know which changesets resulted from which one.

Can you try replying to https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-bot-like-comments-on-changesets/126587/7 in the forum?

I've added two nodes, both of which have pictures:

node/12626336200 is an "Unsuitable for Motors" sign pointing south. There's a picture of the sign.

node/12626377501 is a place where there is _no_ sign on the track pointing east. There's a picture showing that there is no sign.

Does that answer your question?

Thanks!

I went in for a beer, and inside it was more like a pub than a bar.

There's no sign pointing east down Hambleton Road and Oldstead Bank. There is one pointing south down High Town Bank Road. See changeset/163067597 .

pssst: note/4645568#map=17/54.232161/-1.201329&layers=N

Ah, thanks.
Slack, obviously, is outside the control of OSMF for archiving for future reference etc., whereas the wiki (hopefully!) should be available for reference until the heat death of the universe...

Thank you. I still don't understand what you're asking here?
I was a shop. It closed. Then it opened again. Then it closed again. Then it opened again. There were at least 3 name changes along the way.

@ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy can you link to where the public discussion happened on c.osm.org?

You're not really explaining yourself very well. I've asked at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-bot-like-comments-on-changesets/126587 - perhaps you could post a comment there?

Hello jajanja3, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Following on from changeset/161257413 , please do use changeset comments that actually explain what you have changed. "Navigation Detail" on its own does not really help anyone.

Best Regards,
Andy

Your question "why" was, I believe answered quite fully by the history of the object and the changeset tags here. That's why I asked the question above.

May I ask what brought this edit and the others at @NinaNesterovaOSM/changeset_comments to your attention?

This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 162736067, 162736386, 162736504, 162736625, 162736843, 162737594, 162737644, 162795263, 162795676, 162795853, 162818469, 162819929.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316