Hello DUGA,
OpenStreetMap is a joint project that we all work on together. Sometimes we make mistakes - I do, and I suspect that you probably do too. A comment like the one you made here on a 3-year-old changeset by a user with only 34 edits to their name because they accidentally misspelt "chapel" makes you look like a bit of a dick.
Perhaps you ought to consider apologising?
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)

Hello 5HAD0W@Brighton&Hove, and welcome to OSM!
I'm not sure what change you were trying to make here (and as you can see from https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/12709957 , someone has already reverted it).
This station has had "usage=tourism" on it for 10 years or so, so no map that is actually bothered about it is going to mistake it for a mainline station.
See e.g. just up the line at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#20/54.43633/-0.72513 - you can see the mainline station in blue, and the NYMR one in brown.
Best Regards,
Andy

Looks like the actual change to https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/5075987456 (the "stop position" for Northern's station here) was to just remove network and operator tags added in changeset/145930795 .
Just mentioning this as a FYI for anyone stumbling across it - the single platform "stop positions" on the national rail network are essentially a work of fiction. The station node/2246553747 already has network and operator on it.

survey 07/1/2/204, ts0576b

Survey 6/1/2024, ts0573c

I've now updated how far it goes back in way/424412503

It may be just a genuine mistake - if you look at https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/3795586 and changeset/144117245 you can see that I forgot to change the name back there.

What I forgot to change here was the name, For the benefit of anyone reading this in English, the wikipedia pages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Crimea (Russian) and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_Republic_of_Crimea (Ukrainian) may help to explain.

We did ask whether there was any on-the-ground justification for a current name:ru here, but didn't receive any reply on that.
To contact the DWG about this either comment here or email data@openstreetmap.org with a subject of "[Ticket#2023111310000152] [OpenStreetMap] way/239299960".

At relation/1761919#map=20/53.77466/-1.02201 The TPT is signed for cyclists NE and for pedestrians SE. "Camino Ingles to Santiago" followers (mainly foot) are signed along the cycle route.

Going eastbound, the explicitly signed "cycle TPT" starts at relation/1761919#map=19/53.77773/-1.02742 (the sign as at the eastern end). NCN65 is also signed over the same route, but the signs are not all in the same places.

Sveikas Tomai,
Ar galite paaiškinti, kodėl čia pasakėte „ne, ne tavo sritis“?
Geriausi linkėjimai,
Andy Townsendas, OSM duomenų darbo grupės vardu.

Hello Tomas,
Can you explain why you said "no, not your area" here?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Thanks - done in changeset/145817976

My recollection is that this is artificial turf, yes.

way/1206690291

I'm guessing perhaps residential not reservoir :)

Was that based on a visit or something? I see you changed Castle Howard to a castle too: way/35902933/history . That changeset says that it's adding a wikidata link, but even its wikipedia page says its not a castle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Castle%20Howard?uselang=en-GB .

Hello,
What was the logic for changing Chatsworth House into a castle here?
Best Regards,
Andy

RE relation/13803250/history ("defensive_works=reduit") I think that, despite what wikipedia says, the more common English word is for this is "redoubt" despite (like many of these words) it being borrowed from other European languages. This is the original sense from which "national redoubt" (which wikipedia does know about) was derived. See e.g. way/1221451048 ("Redoubt Fortress"), and it's also worth a look through https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/1079/pg1079-images.html#chap01 . One of the characters there is a veteran of the Nine Years War, so you'll find counterscarps and redoubts galore, but no "reduit".