Hello Osm1980,
I hope you don't mind me asking about an edit from 6 years ago. It appears from the "imagery_used" tag here that you've used Google StreetView-based imagery here. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

@dpolovinkin No, "automatically as part of a block" is not an option, I'm afraid - reverts will need to be done on a case by case or at least changeset by changeset basis.
For example, this one is St Petersburg only, and looking at an example object https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/23021763 shows that name:uk was only added in May by someone who's known not to be a St Petersburg resident, and about whom there have been complaints about poor quality translations elsewhere.
However, it may be possible to verify some of the name:uk over in https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1z2nhttps://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1z2n , for example.

@MrKooken For the avoidance of doubt Marc didn't say anything to me about this issue until after I had commented above.
However, "Misschien kun je beter in jouw eigen stad gaan prutsen." doesn't really leave much to the imagination, does it?

Thanks!

Hello,
Regarding way/950012192/history , you might want to have a chat with "Alex Foxfield", whose edit after yours here was "Connecting path together ".
Cheers,
Andy

Hello,
Regarding way/950012192/history , you might want to have a chat with drnoble, whose last edit here was "... Trail closed ...".
Cheers,
Andy

Unless @miBoieq can provide a photograph of a place with a Ukrainian name in St Petersburg, I'd suggest that reverting this changeset was entirely reasonable.

Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. As a frequent flyer-over of and occasional visitor to centre-pivot irrigation infrastructure, I'd definitely have thought that it was better described in OSM terms as "farmland" rather than "meadow". Looking at an example such as osm.org/#map=15/43.3265/-120.5190 it's pretty clear that whatever crop that was isn't just meadow grass - crop rows and tramlines are clearly visible.
If you think that that is wrong, I'd suggest discussing it on the community forum (perhaps at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/help-and-support/tagging/71 ).
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
In this changeset you've deleted a PIRATA buoy in the Atlantic, node/3815077900/history .
Was that deliberate?
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks!

OK, the area around this course is now reverted and the LDPs etc. are complete again. To see the old data, use https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1yTD . It seems that the main thing missing now are "hole" ways such as way/1196053626 . These can easily be undeleted or just remapped (there are only 18 of them!).
Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask!

Following the revert I've deleted way/1196119570/history

Reverting some poor quality 'delete and remap' that broke many existing features inc LDPs. See changeset/139626415

@LockOnGuy Please provide photographic evidence of the names of some of the streets edited here.

Hallo MrKooken,
Helaas kan ik alleen maar herhalen wat Marc al eerder heeft gezegd - "In de tussentijd vraag ik je of je misschien je taalgebruik een beetje wilt matigen ten opzichte van de andere OSM-mappers" en "Als je het er niet mee eens bent, begin dan gerust een discussie op dat punt hier:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/".
Hartelijke groeten,
Andy Townsend, namens OSM's Data Working Group

Hello MrKooken,
Unfortunately, I can only echo what Marc has already said earlier - "In the meantime, I do ask if you might want to moderate your language a bit towards the other OSM mappers" and "If you disagree, feel free to start a discussion on that point here:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/".
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Unfortunately, these edits have completely broken lots of other features such as relation/11271488/history , relation/4035125 etc. As the mapper here has left this course entirely now - see osm.org/#map=17/51.62132/0.14164&layers=D - I'll revert these.
As a general rule of thumb it is NOT OK to delete everything and remap. Details from the previous mapping will be inevitably lost, and history is also lost.

Hello,
I've added the new roundabout to the various route relations that the road is part of in changeset/139860567 - you can see that at e.g. relation/7346402#map=17/52.24453/-6.34801 .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
It looks like this edit created a gap in the Chichester Harbour Area of Natural Beauty - you can see that at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1yTs . I've filled it in so that it follows the former service roads that were deleted relation/9336138#map=16/50.8012/-0.9654 . If you know a more correct line here, please do adjust it.
Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks VLD302. Are there any other edits that you have made that might be similar?