Oddly, someone thinks that this path is still open - perhaps it is worth commenting on changeset/138109479 ?
Also, photos would be great...

Cockup - My notes just say "post" for each. I've changed them.

For the avoidance of doubt, this is a revert to the state immediately before the edits - it does not mean that previous values were "correct". As an example, I'd expect that way/1184324514/history would have names in both Ukrainian (name:uk) and Russian (name:ru), and that the "name" tag would follow the rules set out in https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .

See osm.org/user_blocks/7240 for why this data was reverted. See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/100629/21 and the following comments.

Thanks!

Thanks

Thanks

Thanks!

Hello node/6800626687 has "wheelchair=yes;no" on it. If it's accessible from one side I'd have expected "yes"?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
It looks like there's been a problem merging things into node/4735935534/history as it now has "wheelchair=no;yes".
Cheers,
Andy

Hello,
I was wondering how to interpret the "wheelchair" = "nolive_music=yes" tag on Upstairs @ Ronnie's here?
Cheers,
Andy

Hello,
I'm guessing that the wheelchair tag on way/1159243300 should perhaps be a width?
Regards,
Andy

Should the wheelchair tag on node/9649547673 perhaps be a source tag?

Hello,
Poundland node/10687900249/history has "wheelchair=t" on it. Is that a yes or a no, or something else?
Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I've changed node/9921540891 from wheelchair=partial to wheelchair=limited, which I presume is what was meant here?
Regards,
Andy

@Marc Mongenet - you clearly still have a problem with this, but perhaps a discussion on one changeset and a talk page on the wiki (where almost no-one will see it) probably aren't the best way to win people over to your point of view? I suspect that some of the language used here and there ("Laziness", "Dogmatism", "Short-sightedness") won't persuade many people either.
Maybe a breath of fresh air followed by a discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org would be better? Explain what you believe is the problem and why it is a problem, and explain the approaches that various OSM communities have taken.
Regards,
Andy

Please use better changeset descriptions than just "fix".

Thanks!

（上記コメントを日本語に自動翻訳）

JaLooooNz さん、こんにちは。

このタグは削除すべきだというコミュニティの合意にもかかわらず、service=driveway2 が増殖し続けているようですね。 このタグをデータベースから一括で削除するつもりです。 次のメインディスカッションスレッドを参照してください。

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proused-bulk-removal-of-service-driveway2/100549

I agree that "historic=bridge_site" makes more sense than "historic=bridge site", but when you're changing tags like this it would make sense to contact people who are actually consuming the data.
In this case, if you go to https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/historic=bridge%20site#projects you'll see a link to https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/projects/someoneelse_style and from there to a github project where you can create an issue.