Can you post a photograph somewhere?

Actually, osm.org/user_blocks/7023

Hello rogeriocs,
What was your source of the street name "Avenida Luana Beatriz Fontenelle" here?
Best Regards,
Andy

See block 6951 et al.

Can you show us a photograph of a sign?

Actually, re my statement above ("There are no parcel boundaries between there are the sports field") I've just spotted that there is a parcel boundary between the "park" (if that is what it is - I'm really not sure) and the river. I didn't see it before because the river was in the wrong place, and I've now moved it.

Olá rogeriocs,
Qual era a origem de toda a "Rua Célia Leal Borges" neste changeset?
Atenciosamente,
andy

Hello rogeriocs,
What was the source of all the "Rua Célia Leal Borges" in this changeset?
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks!

Hello RandomPenguin1778, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Would it be possible to use changeset comments that are a bit more descriptive than "Just added some changes"? It's been mentioned before - changeset/134132271 .
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: Any other questions, please don't hesitate to ask.

I'm not sure why the other two names aren't showing up (they don't show up on a different map to OSM's standard rendering either). The names look OK to me. They may be a bit long to fit at some zoom levels but even when zoomed in (elsewhere) beyond what this map can show I still don't see names displayed - very odd.

Hello,
I'm guessing that you'll need to add a "building" tag to way/95708858 as well. In the online editor, if you scroll down at the left you can expand the "tags" that OSM uses (these are calculated based on what you typed in at the top left).
If you add "building" with a value of "yes" it'll appear as a building.
I'm not sure how other "places where boats are maintained" are added in OpenStreetMap - maybe find another one and then use "?" to query what is actually tagged there.
Best Regards,
Andy

No problem - I already had a note set to do a tidy up in a few day's time. There may of course be other "new users making edits" between now and then.

Thanks - that changeset comment is much more useful - it says what you're doing, why you're doing it and where you're doing it.
Best Regards,
Andy

For info see osm.org/user_blocks/7008 .

Thanks for reverting, but actually way/413446964/history at least needs to go one stage further back - locals here have said that it's "proposed", if that. See https://kitchener.citynews.ca/local-news/new-highway-7-between-kitchener-and-guelph-seemingly-snubbed-again-by-province-5158523 , apparently.

If they did, we've not seen the report yet, but we spotted the change, hence the thanks above.
Cheers,
Andy, from the DWG

You can do it in JOSM. I've done it in changeset/134305473 .

Also filled in some gaps and clipped some accidental spurs off NCN27.

Also cuts an accidental spur off. See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1t8l