Now (10 years later!) that way/1042413994 exists, is there still a need for way/172152776 ?
Cheers,
Andy

Oops - something went a bit wrong here. At way/1151620436 , this edit (I think) broke the National Park boundary relation/2678988 by creating a hole in it - the small joining way way/203258210 wasn't rejoined.
Also, a gap appeared in the road that joined the BOAT to the west and part of the footpath to the south seems to have become road.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1s5D is how things were on 28th Feb (you can click on the ways to see more detail at that point in history), https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1s5G is at midnight last night and https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1s5J is after I've joined it back up again.
Best Regards,
Andy

Nothing on the ground (other than the street name) supports the name.

I'm confused - how did node/3196433293/history get changed to a pub here?

I think there has been a bit of a muddle about "Creaksea Place" and "Creaksea Place Barns".
I have no local knowledge of the area, but it appears that the hotel is where the barns are, and the website of the barns is on the hotel.

I think there has been a bit of a muddle about "Creaksea Place" and "Creaksea Place Barns".
I have no local knowledge of the area, but it appears that the hotel is where the barns are, and the website of the barns is on the hotel.

This changeset has some problems - the southern area is a bit crude and intersects some SJU buildings; the northern one has been added as the new building way/474497957/history only. That is run by them, but so is much of the adjacent land - see e.g. node/9502748999 . I bet that you could complete that properly using only open data such as the Cadastral Parcels - in fact you could also use those to improve the accuracy of the new hospital to the north as well.

Hello,
Are you sure that way/289494150 is really a building? It doesn't look much like a building...
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello GPS@G,
What was the source of the name that you used here? It doesn't seem to be visible on the Bing Maps Aerial imagery that you used.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello EnglandEditor019, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Just in case you are not aware, the Ukrainian community in OSM has said this: osm.wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war

I would therefore suggest that it's not a good idea to remotely map in Ukraine while the war is ongoing.

Best Regards,
Andy

Hello Krawujewatz,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. As has already been requested above, please don't map active war zones within Ukraine while the war is ongoing. Unless you are in the area yourself any sources you are using will be completely out of date.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello GPS@G,
What was the source of the name that you used here? It doesn't seem to be visible on the BDOrtho IGN imagery that you used.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hehe - I've no idea what way/1117324034 is, but I bet it's not a glacier!

Thanks - way/1150001201 now has much more details.

Hello,
Just wondered if the South West Coast Path should now route over way/1138299551 ? There's currently a bit of a gap at relation/2373766#map=16/50.9214/-4.5497 .

No worries - I just thought that you might have the "inside track" on that!

I'll ask the creator of way/1138299551 .

... so that would suggest informal=yes; access=no?

Hello,
It would be helpful to explain in a bit more detail why you re-added way/1150001201 . I know from a separate email that it's based on a GPS trace, but it would really help other mappers if you explained a bit more about what you did.
Also, a highway=path on its own isn't very helpful - surely some other tags could be added here?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello Zol87,
I'd be great if you could give a bit more of a meaningful description than "Fixed Streets" - what was wrong, what did you fix? What source was used?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
What is the source of your change to way/174566130/history#map=18/32.74353/-117.19409 ?
Is it a street sign somewhere, or something else?
Best Regards,
Andy