Hello,
Just wondered what "designation=Testing" meant on node/3782781466/history ?
Cheers,
Andy

(actually initially in changeset/129365512 rather than here).
If any of this is confusing, I'd be more than happy to stick a diary entry together to explain. I wrote @SomeoneElse/diary/397310 a while back, but that's more about the "how" rather than the "what".

Hello, it looks like you've added something to the superrelation relation/9474838 by accident here (it's very confusing - they do have the same name!).
Cheers,
Andy

@Emilius123 er, what?

So you visited the site and observed the "ref" on the ground, and got a tape measure out and measured the length?
Or did you copy the data from somewhere else?

Thanks. How does the route join up in Teignmouth? There are a couple of gaps visible at relation/3076124#map=16/50.5456/-3.5003 , and you can also see them at http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=3076124

Ha! OK, thanks.

No. This is a straight revert of changeset/128428505 (a world-spanning mechanical edit). Any attempt to break this up into smaller pieces would overcomplicate matters.

Thanks!

To add to ^^ this looks (at least in part) like a problematic import. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/merging-multiple-wikidata-tags/5839/8 for more details.

> Not relevant.

OK, so you got the ref and the length from some other source then? What source was that?

What is the licence associated with the data from "uk_airfield_guide"?

> I have made the necessary corrections in the changeset/126696606.

No, that was your original change 2 months ago. Your recent change here was changeset/129231222 , but that seems to have made the problem worse. https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1o6e shows a big gap in the NCN21 cycle route. Previously you'd split off way/1098274790/history , now you have deleted that altogether.

Perhaps you could explain what you are actually trying to map here? Presumably someone came to you with a report and said that something needed changing here. What did they say? What other information did they provide?

Just like I mentioned previously on changeset/126649142 , please try and use better descriptions than just "segment deleted".
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello immavasa,

Unfortunately, your edit here has broken a cycle route here.

Before:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nGa

After:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nGb

and also the designation tagging was lost from the road:
https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=20&lat=51.2476049&lon=-0.136456

(on that map public bridleways appear in bloue, and cycle routes with purple dots).

Please do re-add the way to any missing routes and also reinstate the designation tagging. If you'd like any help doing this please let us know.

Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks

What was the source of the data added here (ref, length, etc.)?

I didn't notice anything the last time I went past the end of way/1112454343 , which was 4/1/2020, but it may be that use has (re)started since then - earlier imagery (Bing in iD) shows a hedge; later imagery (Bing in JOSM, Maxar) shows a gap in the hedge.

@MikeN - I've asked the user to reply here via osm.org/user_blocks/6545 .

@archpdx - I've asked the user to reply here via osm.org/user_blocks/6545 .

@Adam Franco - I've asked the user to reply here via osm.org/user_blocks/6545 .