Hello,
I think that something has gone a bit wrong here. https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1013226608 wasn't originally a highwayof any sort - it was just part of the Cotswold AONB relation relation/166570 . It's quite long way/1013226608 , so I expect that the part that is "Stonehill Lane" will need to be added sparately.

One more thing - if you're familiar with the area and know that it's definitely a public bridleway you could add the "designation=public_bridleway" tag to make it clear that that is the legal status.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello fentuz and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've said "based on local knowledge and confirmed on OS map" in the changeset comment here. Just to be clear, "local knowledge" is absolutely fine - it's more useful than any other source. "OS Maps", generally speaking, can't be used as they aren't licence-compatible with OSM. There are some exceptions - in the in-browser editor that you've used here you'll see "OS OpenData StreetView" and "OS OpenMap Local". They do have compatible licences and can be used - but you won't get rights of way information on them.
Some of the things that you've changed on
https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/912820680 , like "surface=dirt", aren't actually available from OS maps (of any type) so must have come from local knowledge I guess?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
As well as the changes to e.g. way/53100715 this also seemed to edit a river in Moscow, adding way/23985851 with role "outer", whch is presumably a mistake...

@Fred73000 - in the great scheme of things, empty relations (with or without tags) don't really matter. They've got no components with any geometry, so no-one is going to encounter them by mistake when they are interacting with OSM data, unless they are explicitly looking for empty relations.
The response of the JOSM developers at https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/20781 and https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21825 seems reasonable to me, including trying to understand what actually happened in some of the cases, like changeset/106596700 .

@Fred73000 - it's a wiki; if you feel that it is important that a wiki page is not incorrect please update it.

... and the Old Grey Mare in Clifton has an outside seating area.

Also Wigginton from survey 29/5/2022, tr8881b

I John,
I've just changed the Derwent Valley Heritage route from https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1juh and https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jug to one that goes past node/5552186934 , https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jui , north of the canal. I surveyed the markers 4 years ago but for some reason never adjusted the route to go past node/5552186934 . You made part of the adjustment in this changeset and I've now filled in the gaps - hope this si all OK!
Best Regards,
Andy

"from https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1juh" is what it should say. The new route is https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jui , north of the canal

(see changeset/121864134 for more discussion about a similar change)

(see changeset/121864134 for more discussion about a similar change)

The drink: namespace has about 20k uses https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=drink and the sells: namespace about 400 https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=sells , but both are in use. However it is unclear what "drink" value would be valid here; drink:wine=*?uselang=en-GB and even drink=* are very unclear.
Changing a tag from one typo to another is fine, but this clearly isn't a "typo fix". Perhaps have a chat with the person who originally added the tag in changeset/102319920 ?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello dufekin,
Following on from Marc's message above, please do reply to the questions above, and to a number of others at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=30521 .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of the Data Working Group

Hola,
Este conjunto de cambios elimina una boya meteorológica en el Atlántico node/3815077900. ¿Fue eso deliberado? Si no, lo restableceré.
Saludos,
Andy

Hello,
This changeset deletes a weather buoy in the Atlantic node/3815077900 . Was that deliberate? If not, I'll reinstate it.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello Fred73000,
Are you familiar with the location here? You've added a place of worship tag to a ceonference centre area way/498973313/history , which seems very unlikely.
Clearly the conference-centre is Christian-focused, but that doesn't mean that the whole thing (including the golf course) is a place of worship, surely?

@ Fred73000 - la suppression automatique des relations sans membres (mais avec d'autres balises valides) ne profite en aucun cas à OSM. Si vous voyez un problème, veuillez contacter le mappeur d'origine (poliment !) en expliquant qu'il a peut-être oublié d'y ajouter des chemins ou des relations, ou qu'il a oublié de le supprimer.
Cordialement,
Andy Townsend, au nom du groupe de travail sur les données d'OSM.

@Fred73000 - automatically deleting relations with no members (but with other valid tags) does not benefit OSM in any way. If you see a problem, please contact the original mapper (politely!) explaining that they may have forgotten to add ways or relations to it, or have forgotten to delete it.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Привет, ОсмКазахстан.
Не могли бы вы объяснить, почему вы удалили все дороги здесь? Это ошибка или проблема с ними?
С уважением,
Энди