SomeoneElse's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 43554892 | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
|
|
| 43548167 | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
|
|
| 43564308 | Hola y bienvenidos a OpenStreetMap!
|
|
| 43551005 | Hi,
|
|
| 43551610 | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
|
|
| 43526343 | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
|
|
| 41880150 | @manoharuss They've not edited since the last changeset discussion comment so I don't think trying to 0-hour block will achieve anything. What remains is to try and figure out whether the data in changesets such as this is worth keeping or not. I'm a bit far away to comment on that; you're at least on the same continent :) |
|
| 43530109 | Hi Gerrit,
|
|
| 43379184 | Hi Gerrit,
|
|
| 43513686 | Hi Gerrit,
|
|
| 43159368 | No - the point of a multipolygon is not to share the same tags. It's to joining things that really are related in the real world. |
|
| 43426104 | Thanks for fixing (I hadn't noticed that this changeset was you fixing things in iD)! |
|
| 43501590 | @SHARCRASH, heres an example where it makes sense to have two polygons linked together: relation/4807529 . Here the two pieces of natural=wood together form "Breck's Plantation" - they are logically one thing. However it doesn't make sense to join things into one multipolygon just because they have the same tag. For example; where I'm sat at the moment there's a car park to my left and one a little way over to my right - they are both car parks but aren't in the same multipolygon because they are different car parks. |
|
| 42997641 | Thanks - must have missed or fogotten about it from last year. |
|
| 43159368 | That relation as of 1st November can be viewed at http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/jWT . Can you explain what the two pieces of meadow west of the CR106 have in common with each other, and with the piece to the east, apart from happening to have the same tags? |
|
| 43159368 | Hi SHARCRASH,
|
|
| 43501590 | @SHARCRASH You added way/431452509/history as a circular highway=track 4 months ago. Are you saying that that is incorrect? |
|
| 43493729 | Hello,
|
|
| 43434843 | Sorry for the noise - just spotted it was you that deleted it! |
|
| 43425143 | Oops - this changeset accidentally included a node at latitude 0, longitude 0 node/4484100423/history . I've deleted it. |