OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
41859978

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've added node/4379946790 as a hunting stand called "pay toll".
Please be aware that when you add things in MAPS.ME you're actually adding things to OpenStreetMap, and everyone will see them. If this really does exist as a toll booth then please change it (using a proper OSM editor, not MAPS.ME) to indicate that it's a toll booth, not a hunting stand.
If you'd like any help doing this please let me know.
Best Regards,
Andy

41891964

Did you actually mean to delete the building way/256199791 or just remove the name from it? Obviously if the building (or actually buildings joined together) have been demolished it makes sense to remove them, but if not I can restore the building (but remove the wrong name, obviously) if you'd like.

41891270

Previous blocks (on both sides) and . https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2016-September/054885.html said very clearly not to carry out edit wars. The DWG does not endorse either side of this argument and will revert mass edits in either direction.
Please continue the discussion on https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/ and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it-sardinia/ .

41878903

For more background on Nominatim's use of "is_in", see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2016-August/076596.html .

41841056

Actually - what sort of B&M is this? There's "B & M Bargains" (which is a classic "variety store") and the slightly more upmarket "B & M Home Store". That gets various tags, including "homewares": http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/iaP (but probably not really a supermarket).

41872899

Thanks botdidier2020 - 26 times may be something of a record!

41597517

@KaleenaSawyer @pete404 Is this something that needs reverting? Let me know if you need any help.
- Andy

37757548

@zstadler Thanks for helping to resolve the mess here!

41824965

I suspect what's happening here is that ENSG Battir is trying to delete a number of duplicately-imported and overlapping walls. Have a look at a small area in an editor and you'll see the problem - lots of duplicate nodes, and also duplicated features (walls so close together with no access points that makes it clear that they've not been properly surveyed).
See also changeset/37757548
Je soupçonne que ce qui se passe ici est que ENSG Battir tente de supprimer un certain nombre de murs duplicately importés et qui se chevauchent. Jetez un oeil à une petite zone dans un éditeur et vous verrez le problème - beaucoup de nœuds en double, et dispose également dupliqués (murs si proches avec aucun point d'accès qui le rend clair qu'ils ont pas été correctement étudiés).
Voir aussi changeset/37757548

41820569

It looks like node/4376881826 is spelt wrong and already mapped?

41820571

If there's a starbucks here I'd map it separately. Also, is this perhaps a duplicate of the other amenity=fuel just to the west?

41805487

salut! Quelque chose a très mal ici.
Vous avez créé way/439899731 qui était une réplique presque exacte de way/394388199 qui a été créé il y a 7 mois (et toutes les autres données de la même zone semblait être dupliqué trop).
Vous avez également créé way/439899732/history qui était un grand bâtiment couvrant la majeure partie de l'Amérique centrale et du sud. Vous pouvez voir la taille de celui-ci sur http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=41805487.
J'ai revins, mais dois demander quelle était la source de ces données? Vous ne l'avez pas utilisé un marqueur source ou changeset commentaire, que vous devriez vraiment faire.
Meilleures salutations,
Andy Townsend, au nom du groupe de travail des données de OpenStreetMap

41805377

This seems to be another changeset of duplicates - for example way/439899205 .

41805487

Hello! Something has gone very wrong here.
You created way/439899731 which was an almost exact duplicate of way/394388199 which was created 7 months ago (and all the other data in the same area seemed to be duplicated too).
You also created way/439899732/history which was a large building covering most of central and south america. You can see the size of it on http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=41805487 .
I've reverted this, but must ask what was the source of this data? You've not used any source tag or changeset comment, which you really should do.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group

37593620

Hello again,
Following on from my "I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group" comment above, we'd had feedback from lots of OSM mappers in the area. The findings and the changes that will be made are described at
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 . If you have any further comments you can contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org
Thanks,
Andy

40325617

Hello again,
Following on from my "I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group" comment above, we'd had feedback from lots of OSM mappers in the area. The findings and the changes that will be made are described at
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 . If you have any further comments you can contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org
Thanks,
Andy

39925416

Hello again,
Following on from my "I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group" comment above, we'd had feedback from lots of OSM mappers in the area. The findings and the changes that will be made are described at
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 . If you have any further comments you can contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org
Thanks,
Andy

40299096

Hello again,
Following on from my "I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group" comment above, we'd had feedback from lots of OSM mappers in the area. The findings and the changes that will be made are described at
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 . If you have any further comments you can contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org
Thanks,
Andy

31135667

Hello again,
Following on from my "I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group" comment above, we'd had feedback from lots of OSM mappers in the area. The findings and the changes that will be made are described at
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 . If you have any further comments you can contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org
Thanks,
Andy

38519866

Hello again,
Following on from my "I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group" comment above, we'd had feedback from lots of OSM mappers in the area. The findings and the changes that will be made are described at
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 . If you have any further comments you can contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org
Thanks,
Andy