Hello Rui Tavares,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 8 years ago. You added a "source=Google Maps" tag with the hamlet here. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here.
Is it somewhere that you are familiar with?

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Thanks - I've re-edited based on what I can see in the Bing imagery in osm.org/browse/changeset/109625906 . If you can add more with local knowledge, please do!

Hola CesarFD,

Espero que no le importe que le pregunte sobre algo que se agregó a OpenStreetMap hace 8 años. Agregaste una etiqueta "source = Google Maps" a la carretera aquí. En realidad, no podemos usar eso como fuente en OSM porque la licencia de Google no permite que se use aquí.
¿Es algún lugar con el que esté familiarizado?

Atentamente
Andy Townsend, en nombre del Grupo de trabajo de datos de OSM

Hello CesarFD,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 8 years ago. You added a "source=Google Maps" tag to the road here. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here.
Is it somewhere that you are familiar with?

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Hola Ricard S,

Espero que no le importe que le pregunte sobre algo que se agregó a OpenStreetMap hace 3 años. Agregó una etiqueta "source = Google Maps" a way/619154999 aquí. En realidad, no podemos usar eso como fuente en OSM porque la licencia de Google no permite que se use aquí.
¿Es algún lugar con el que esté familiarizado?

Atentamente
Andy Townsend, en nombre del Grupo de trabajo de datos de OSM

Hello Ricard S,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 3 years ago. You added a "source=Google Maps" tag to way/619154999 here. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here.
Is it somewhere that you are familiar with?

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Hello KatelynAzurefire,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 3 years ago. You added a "source=Google Maps" tag on "Home Hardware" here. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. You've added "source=local␣knowledge" to this changeset so I guess that it is somewhere that you are familiar with?

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Hello marty buchan,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 3 years ago. You added a "source=Google Maps" tag on the park here. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. You've later added "source_1=local␣knowledge" so I guess that it is somewhere that you are familiar with?

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Also includes Clither Beck and other streams from OSSV and survey

Not sure what happened there. Comment should have been "Stew and Oyster beer and wheelchair tags"

Hello Some User,
I'd be really helpful if your changeset comments had a bit more information in than simply "Accuracy Update" - perhaps explain what you were editing and where, and what the source was?
Best Regards,
Andy
(I happened to notice this change by accident while looking for something in Paphos)

also Wolds Way

Hello,
I think that the Esri imagery that you used to add way/736237026 was a bit offset - you can tell this by comparing the various available imagery sources with OS StreetView here (which is reliable for roads)
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
You've added way/702022800 here based on Esri imagery, but you can see by looking at the other layers (including OS StreetView, which is old, but nt misaligned) you can see that the Bing imagery here is pretty good and Esri is significantly offset. Please check all available layers to try and avoid offset problems.
Best Regards,
Andy

Resolves some rogue/unconnected landuse not resolved by previous changeset

This resolves some of the landuse west of the river (the "meadow" clearly doesn't include the trees into the river) but there's more to do.

This also includes woodland from the roadside and Bing

There's also some patching up of landuse=farmland in here too, based on Bing imagery and (to the south of the area) survey. More still to do - what is in OSM is very roughly drawn in places.

(not room for it in the initial comment but) also based on survey 27/6/2021

Also New Earswick, 23/6, tr7900b