node/562693531/history started off as a bus stop on the main road but is now a farm.
Presumably that was an accident?

Is this really a viewpoint? By definition a reef's at sea-level isn't it? Surely that would restrict what you'd be able to see :)

Is "convenience" the best tag for the Poundland? Maybe "shop=variety_store" would be better - it seems to be marginally more popular http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/hvR .

Not sure how it happened, but this introduced an unconnected node in the South Atlantic node/4294151464/history . I've deleted it.

Hi,
Something went wrong here - a node was added at latitude 0, longitude 0. I've deleted it.
Best Regards,
Andy
こんにちは、
何かが間違ってここに行ってきました - ノードは緯度0で添加し、私はそれを削除した経度0に。
宜しくお願いします、
アンディー

Thanks - I'll get emails if you comment here, so that's as good a way as any if you want to talk to me.
I'd ask via the imports list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports about any imports though - people there will have more experience of doing imports than me.

Should way/242553420/history be tagged as a roundabout?

I'd try just explaining what it's for first. The forum's something of a backwater (at least the English-speaking side of it) - not many people will read what you write there.

You'll want amenity=school on the school relation presumably? Unless I've completely misunderstood what's happening here...

Do you reckon that way/110092734 is still in occasional use? The tracks are still there (at least where it crosses the service road at node/639203533 ), but there shrubs growing through the line are 2-3 ft high now.

Hi,
I'm guessing that way/430051718 , and the other houses in the terrace, should be "building=house" not "building=H"?
Cheers,
Andy

You can remove it if you like, or if you'd rather than I did I don't mind removing it - just let me know.

Hi Joachim,
Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately I suspect that CC-BY-4.0 may have incompatible attribution requirements: osm.wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility . What I suspect that you'll need to do is ask for explicit permission for use in OpenStreetMap. People on the imports list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports or the legal-talk list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk may be able to help with how to go forward from here.
Best Regards,
Andy

Excellent - thanks.
It's always good to get updates from someone who's actually been there :)

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
"Pioneers Camp" here seems like a duplicate - you've also added it as node/3720394025 - or are there really both something best described as a hotel and a campsite operating together here?
It'd be great if someone familiar with the area could add a bit more detail around Sindabezi Island too - that looks a bit lonely in the river without any of the islands mapped!
Cheers,
Andy

Can you explain exactly what the capital_ISO3166-1 tag means, perhaps here: osm.wiki/w/index.php?search=capital_ISO3166-1&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go ?

Hi,
The LBS is already mapped (as two amenity=university buildings way/9799522 and way/8076186 ). I've removed this node.
If there's a problem with it not appearing on some map or app, I'd raise that with whoever maintains that.
Hope you don't mind me mentioning this; just trying to help. Any questions please don't hesitate to ask.
Cheers,
Andy

Re way/164815873/history en changeset/40964862 que diriez-vous:
"Suppression de 2 lignes électriques à Marlborough, Massachusetts qui étaient des répliques exactes des autres ajoutées par le même mappeur en même temps, par exemple, way/164815873/history que exactement dupliqués way/161617009/history."

Dans les cas où le mappeur est toujours actif (comme ici) Je voudrais aussi commenter le changeset qui a introduit les doublons (ici changeset/11689443 ).

Re way/164815873/history in changeset/40964862 how about:
"Removed 2 power lines in Marlborough, Mass that were exact duplicates of others added by the same user at the same time. For example, way/164815873/history that exactly duplicated way/161617009/history ."
In cases where the mapper is still active (as here) I'd also comment on the changeset that introduced the duplicates (here changeset/11689443 ).

Thanks Joachim - let's wait until you get a reply from the data source, and until people have had a chance to comment on the data. I'd expect that at least some of the tags would need to be removed (e.g. "SUPERFICIE=0"), but let's wait to check that the data source is OK licence-wise before doing anything else.
Best Regards,
Andy (on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group)

Well node/4174954579/history was moved, but the node membership of neither way/222812502 nor way/12397390 changed, so it must have been connected before.