Thanks for adding these. I had no idea there was a crossing across the 680 entry ramp at way/541384478 - don't think I'd fancy trying it in the dark!

@Safwat The change at changeset/53842443 suggests that "Moovit Team" might actually be reacting to comments, even if they're not replying in changeset discussions.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap,
You've tagged way/537394875/history with a name of "non exsist boundary". Is this country boundary not in the correct place, and if not where should it be?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy

Oops - it looks like you added the "learnosm" test data to OSM by accident here. It's not your fault - there's supposed to be a flag in that to prevent that happening :)

Oops - it looks like you added the "learnosm" test data to OSM by accident here. It's not your fault - there's supposed to be a flag in that to prevent that happening :)

Hello,
As has been pointed out on the "imports" mailing list a number of times over the last month or so, there are still problems with newly-added sidewalks not actually joining to anything. way/540087287 is an example in this changeset.
Back in September you asked in https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-September/005160.html for "a community review of our project". What people said in reply were things that included 'Please confirm that your process will not be limited to "uploading"
sidewalks but also ensuring they are properly connected'. It's been two months now; which is more than enough time to process and deal with that request.
Unconnected sidewalk ways are fundamentally useless in OSM; they only become useful when they form part of a routable network.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
There seems to be a bit of a problem with at least one of the sidewalks added here -
way/540095721 doesn't actually connect to anything else. Without connections, nothing that consumes OSM data will be able to do anything useful with the data.
This has been discussed in detail on the imports mailing list and elsewhere (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-November/005233.html has quite a bit of detail, but there are earlier and later posts too). Please make sure that sidewalks are joined across roads to the adjacent sidewalk where it's legal for a pedestrian to cross.
If you've got any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

I've never been there, but can't believe that "wreck" makes sense here?

I'm guessing that the spelling of "Mandale Enginer House" on node/5198601990 is possibly a typo?

The signage I've seen is at the north of the rec ground that has the football goals on it. The cricket ground just has signage for "Farnsfield Cricket Club".
If you know someone that has better information then please update it - someone who lives there is far more likely to know than someone (me) just reading the signs on the gates!

Hello,
Can you explain what "piste_type=yes" (with no other tags) on way/539965621 is supposed to indicate?
Best Regards,
Andy

Cześć,
To było dawno temu, ale myślę, że coś poszło nie tak z way/256251796, historia jest ustawiona na "{'ruins': 1}".
Z poważaniem,
Andy

Hello,
I now that this was a long time ago, but I think that something went wrong with way/256251796, historic is set to "{'ruins': 1}".
Best Regards,
Andy

Hi,
Not sure exactly what happened, but way/522140839 was set as construction. That way was created here, but likely split from something else. I've removed the construction tag, but I suspect that it belongs on a subarea somewhere.
Cheers,
Andy

Bonjour, way/417842657/history semble occuper le même site que way/400012874. Savez-vous lequel est correct?

Hello, way/417842657/history seems occupy the same site as way/400012874 . Do you know which one is correct?

You've said here "Fix self intersection of area outline.". Could you explain what the problem actually was?

Not sure how it happened, but a node got added in the Pacific in this change: node/4814186894/history :)

Hello, something's gone a bit wrong here. You've added something in the middle of the Indian ocean node/4718693707/history and a number of other empty nodes and a shelter in a car park?