Hi TR42,
In here relation/6999982 is quite large. You've tagged it as "natural=heath" but then added a note "using heath tag to represent fell, fell tag doesn't do anything.". Please don't tag one thing incorrectly as another just to create a particular effect on one particular map - if you think it would make sense for a particular rendering to include a particular tag/value combination then lobby the people looking after that renderer rather than tagging things incorrectly. Also you've added "FIXME=extent needs checking" - while it's quite usual for OSM to proceed by iteration (less accurately drawn things first, then more accurately drawn things), who exactly are you expecting to fix this up? Are you personally committing to spending the next month or so on the ground in this corner of Wales (which is what it would need to do the job properly? If not, then please don't "colour in" huge areas like this - try doing much smaller areas much more accurately.
Best Regards,
Andy

No problem - I see that they have just been restored - http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=51609472 - so all should be OK now.

It wasn't the B&B I was asking about, it was the administrative boundary relation relation/40581 .

I didn't do a revert, just looked at each of the new "buildings" and changed the most obviously wrong. 42677503 is just one building, but obviously a bit of tidy-up so that the shape matches better would be nice. 42677501 looks OKish (but is that Aldi to the northwest misplaced?). 22734979 and 70850576 looked plausible as buildings as they were.

OK, I've added a couple of buildings from imagery and changed the larger rectangle back to "landuse" (and stretched it a bit to include the car park). Does that look better now?

Also do you know what the southeastern building is? Dunelm Mill is in the northwestern building - are there any other shops in there?

Ciao,
Hai rimosso un paio di tag da relation/40581 - era forse un incidente?
I migliori saluti,
Andy

Hi,
You've removed a couple of tags from relation/40581 - was that perhaps an accident?
Best Regards,
Andy

@RedGel do you need help undoing the problem changes here? This editor hasn't edited for 12 days; it's possible that they may not return.
Best Regards, Andy

Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy

Merhaba,
Rusya'da isminizle birlikte bir marketten gerçekten var mı?
Saygılarımla,
Andy

Hello,
Is there really a convenience store with your name in Russia?
Best Regards,
Andy

If you're familiar with installing a VM yourself you could try https://switch2osm.org/manually-building-a-tile-server-16-04-2-lts/ .

To add "test stuff" to a local rendering you'd need to save a .osc and apply that as a "change".

I've restored the tags on the Barrack from node/393538626/history

No problem - done.

Is Carrington Street closed now as well? way/169581775 is no access but way/167053006 isn't restricted.
I've not been there in a month (when Carrington Street was still open and stuff to the east was fenced off).

Merhaba Mirnamil, OpenStreetMap'e hoş geldiniz!
Son değişikliklerdeki bazı adları değiştirdiniz, "% 100" lik bir changeset yorumu ile.
Lütfen anlamlı değişikliklerle ilgili yorumlar kullanın - "% 100", neyi değiştirdiğinizi veya nedenini veya kaynağı neyi açıklamaktadır.
OSMF'nin tartışmalı bölgelere ilişkin politikasıyla ilgili ayrıntılar için, bkz. Http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf. Bir adın yanlış olduğunu düşünüyorsanız, lütfen orada yaşayan insanların, kullanılmaları gerektiğini düşündüğünüz adı kullandıklarına dair bazı kanıtlar sunun.
Saygılarımla,
Andy Townsend, OpenStreetMap'ın Veri Çalışma Grubu adına.

Hello Mirnamil, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've changed a number of names in recent changesets, with a changeset comment of "100%".
Please do use meaningful changeset comments - "100%" does not explain what you changed or why, or what the source was.
For details on the OSMF's policy on disputed territories, see http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf . If you think a name is incorrect please provide some evidence that the people who actually live there use the name that you think should be used.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.

Hello,
This is a very large changeset with relatively few items in it. How can I see which objects in it are near me?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend

Hi,
I'm guessing that perhaps way/139014661/history could do with an "amenity=funeral_directors" tag on it?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hi,
I suspect that people here might have been trying to say "this is a barber's and not a hairdresser's". If you look at the subtags for hairdresser you'll see that it's often tagged that way: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/hairdresser . Mechanical edits to OSM do need to be discussed as per osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct so that information is not lost (as it has been here) and so that data consumers are aware of the change and can handle it accordingly.
Are you going to retrospectively discuss it, and add back information that has been lost, or do we need to revert these changes?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.