SomeoneElse's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 170696838 | > Indeed, some months ago we detected vandalism in UK counties who is "we"? |
|
| 170904368 | Are you sure that way/579582322 is really a guest house and not just an occasional short term let?
|
|
| 170858581 | Hello Flap Slimy Outward,
|
|
| 169895841 | Thanks! |
|
| 170696838 | Re "the best way to proceed is to take the matter to the relevant OSM communities" it's normally good practice to do that _before_ making changes such as this (and that applies anywhere in the world). There are all sorts of edge cases out there. |
|
| 110081197 | ||
| 170320713 | Thanks - I've re-added it to the relation so that http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=13159639&noCache=true&_noCache=on and http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=13159639 look OK too. |
|
| 169330383 | Hi Jim,
|
|
| 170320713 | Hello,
|
|
| 169082292 | Thanks! |
|
| 169017012 | Thanks! |
|
| 80751590 | Thanks! |
|
| 170266669 | Just to let you know, although Bing imagery still shows the golf course, the Esri imagery in the area (available in iD) shows the new layout.
|
|
| 161284238 | Ah - no: way/1220642957/history
|
|
| 169342968 | Thanks - I'd suggest that if you know where there's signage on the "proposed" relation it's worth you moving it to the other one. |
|
| 165418345 | Thanks! |
|
| 80751590 | Hello,
|
|
| 169330383 | Hello, > everything marked as being accessible by foot seems to be showing up looking like a regular footpath on apps On which apps are you seeing problematical data displayed? It'd be great to have more details so that we can investigate. > I heard back from one app saying that they didn't believe it was their responsibility to fix it themselves .. especially details of that app! At the very least they need to educate their helpdesk. Best Regards,
|
|
| 169330383 | Hello James, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
|
|
| 169894177 | Includes one bike route guidepost in York |