There is (or used to be) at least one signed "C" road near Helmsley, but they're pretty rare.
It would certainly be possible (and not that difficult) to render "official_ref" on a map, but it doesn't make much sense to do so on a general purpose one. As an example, the "prow_ref" on way/266477112 is shown on https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=16&lat=53.23708&lon=-1.10346 - it would be possible to do something similar for offical_ref.
Regards,
Andy

Hi Stu,
To my knowledge, none of these roads "have numbers" in any meaningful sense. They were already tagged with an "official_ref" (used by and only useful to the council). There are no signs, so C93 through Flaxton isn't anything that you can "refer" to.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
With this change you added some toilets called "move point" (which seems an odd name) in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. I've deleted it.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello Rajesultanpur,
Are you sure about the bridge location at osm.org/#map=18/26.74465/82.09145 ? It doesn't seem to match the Bing imagery at that location.
Best Regards,
Andy

One more thing - applications such as MAPS.ME will use "language name tags". If you think "name:az" is missing from areas where the Azeri language is used and it differs from the "name" then I suggest that you add "name:az" tags.
The last time that this was reported I spent a considerable amount of time re-adding back "name:az" tags to places; it is extremely unhelpful for you to come back and _remove_ other language name tags; it means that other mappers are more likely to remove name:az tags in future, which you surely do not want.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello Aysel117,
Here you've removed some of the language names from node/232172609/history . Please don't do that. In osm.org/user_blocks/1194 I stressed the sensitivity of names (as I'm sure you well know).
If you have evidence that the "name" tag itself is wrong (by which I mean a recent on-the-ground observation, not a UN PDF) then please supply it.
I'll revert this change.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend,
on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.

There's actually no recent data from it, but there's actually no recent data from any of the Atlantic stations: http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/obs.shtml so I'm guessing that that's just a glitch.

Hola opengislab,
Esto parece una importación de datos de una agencia gubernamental. No recuerdo haber visto nada en el último año o así en la lista de correo "imports" sobre Colombia, o en "talk-co" sobre la importación de datos de Divipola. Cómo se deben llevar a cabo las importaciones se describe en osm.wiki/Import y osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines.
Atentamente,
Andy Townsend, en nombre del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM.

Hello opengislab,
This looks like an import of data from a government agency. I don't remember seeing anything in the past year or so on the imports mailing list about Colombia, or on talk-co about importing Divipola data. How imports should be carried out is described at osm.wiki/Import and osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Hi Maning,
Thanks for reverting.
No edits by the account that added it since the comment on changeset/47161448 ; we'll see what happens next.

Er - you've just deleted the weather buoy at lat 0, lon 0.
Is it definitely no longer there?
It has its own web page:
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=13010

Hi Shamaun,
Thanks for tidying this up.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello mimakter,
Both of the things that you've added in this changeset have been given a name of "house".
The "name" tag in OSM is really only for names, not for descriptions. If you want to say that "this is a house" than use a "building" tag of "house", not a "name". You can see other commonly used "building" tags here:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/building#values
Also, I see that you are still using the buggy geoMapTool. Please don't do this - it's broken. Collect information from the field and then use one of the regular OSM editors available via the "edit" menu at OpenStreetMap.org to edit the data.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend,
on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.

Hello select,
Thanks for replying to some of the comments at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3042095 . However, all of your changeset comments seem to be just "trace". This isn't helpful to other mappers. Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments and in future use more descriptive comments. This isn't the first time that this has been mentioned - see also changeset/35415777 for example.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.

Hi Stan, hi Will - for info https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html is on a server in Germany now, and should be able to cope with people viewing maps there (though tile scrapers would be a problem).
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
You've accidentally uploaded the "learnosm" test data in the middle of the Atlantic in this changeset :)
I'll delete it...
Also, it would really help if any changeset comment that you use has meaningful comments in it. Yours only has hashtags in it - there's no description of what you're doing.

Best Regards,
Andy

The website that you added suggests that node/715633050/history is shut...

Hello,
You've accidentally uploaded the "learnosm" test data in the middle of the Atlantic in this changeset :)
I'll delete it...
Best Regards,
Andy

Bitte antworten Sie auf die Fragen unter http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4844568 und https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57240 .

Oops, node/4744899153/history was uploaded at "latitude 0, longitude 0". I've deleted it.
Best Regards,
Andy