Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy

Rigardante http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=46864149, ĝi aperus ke vi faris aliajn ŝanĝojn al etikedoj aliaj ol nur Esperanton. Ĉu vi povas ekspliki ĉi kio tiuj ŝanĝoj?
Plej amike,
andy

Looking at http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=46864149 , it would appear that you've made other changes to tags other than just Esperanto. Can you explain here what those changes are?
Best Regards,
Andy

Bitte antworten Sie auf die Fragen unter http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4844568

Oops - somehow in this change you managed to add something at latitude 0, longitude 0 - any idea how that might have happened?

Hi Brian,
You're still not using a separate import account, you're using a #gibberish changeset discussion comment and you're importing duplicates of existing data rather than conflating (e.g. node/4734765468 and node/4149470376).
Are you trying to commit all the "cardinal import sins" in as short a time as possible? :)
Please take a step back from the keyboard and think a little more about what you're doing and how you're doing it.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend,
On behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Hi Brian,
Could you please address the questions raised on changeset/46819034 before continuing to import this data?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hola,
¿Fue su intención retirar la ISO3166-1 para España aquí?
Atentamente,
Andy

Hello,
Was it your intention to remove the ISO3166-1 for Spain here?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hi Brian,
It looks like things may have got a bit ahead of themselves here.
The only list discussion that I can see for this is at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb-westmidlands/2017-March/002127.html , and that's not really a discussion as much as you saying "I'd like to import some trees" and Rob saying "here's how to conflate the data". Almost none of osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines seems to have been followed, and there clearly seem to be issues with the data - taking just the first tree in this changeset node/4732520560 there's a bunch of duplicate information on it (site name, ward etc.) and the species info looks iffy to me (is "Betula sp" supposed to indicate more than just species, where one bit of plant is grafted onto another?).
Elsewhere osm.org/#map=19/52.44699/-1.84369 suggests there's a bit of an offset between tree data and other data which at the very least is worth a bit of discussion.
Also TBH I'd really have expected some thought to be given to "how [Amey] propose to release data for additions and deletions" in https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb-westmidlands/2017-March/002127.html - that's surely key to keeping the data in OSM relevant and not just "some unmaintained import that someone did once".
As an aside, as I'm sure you're aware what trees Amey think they can get rid of and what trees the locals would rather they didn't has been a bit of an issue elsewhere https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/nov/28/sheffield-trees-dispute-scenes-putin-russia-nick-clegg-arrests :)
Usually what happens next when data like this "escapes" into OSM is that the person who imported it realises their mistake and reverts, before doing it properly (after discussion, without extraneous tags, and from an import account) next time.
I'd also cast the discussion net slightly wider than just the west mids list (even though these are just west mids trees), in order to catch the attention of the more "botanically minded" members of the community
It would be a shame if the first action after the creation of the OSM UK Chapter was a dodgy import containing some of the same failings as the original TIGER import, such as duplicate and irrelevant data :)
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
What are you actually trying to do here?
You might find something like http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ more appropriate for whatever it is.
Best Regards,
Andy

Unlike the other one, there probably is a bit of moraine under here (it's a raised bit west of the Rother and the clue's in the nae "Stonegravels") but ir's doesn't really belong in OSM as it stands.
What are you actually trying to do?
You might find something like http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ more appropriate for whatever it is.
Best Regards,
Andy

It's not much of a plateau certainly - St Augustine's Road is very much a hill with the river at the eastern end of it, and the road that drops down to Queen's Park is likewise.
What exactly is it supposed to be?

Hi,
Is node/4407506448/history still a bike shop? It's marked as shop=bicycle (although the name has been removed).
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I'm not sure how it happened, but you've added some things in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.
Please don't do this, even as a test - OpenStreetMap is a map of things that really exist in the world, not test data.
Hope you don't mind me mentioning this, just trying to help. Any questions please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy

relation/7066589 has 37,948 nodes as members. It's just broken an osm2pgsql import here, and I suspect I wont be the only one.

What is it actually supposed to be?

Also,
Tagging way/445462657 as a "village green" is surely wrong.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hi David.
Thanks for the clarification.
Best Regards,
Andy

@stephankn - it is possible to find your own comments (thanks to Pascal!):

http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=61891&commented

Cheers,
Andy

I was there only the other week, and what is now called "Exchange Park" didn't look anything like a park to me :(