In changeset/142961515 I've also changed https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/2814125 to the new name; that had got changed by Barroszt in changeset/142865556 as well.

Дякуємо за повторне додавання правильних нових назв до Багринова вулиця (переписка https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/233). Я також повторно додав сюди old_name:ru, оскільки це _було_ дійсне ім’я до перейменування, яке відбулося після торішнього російського вторгнення в Україну.

Thanks for re-adding the correct new names to Багринова вулиця (following https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/233 ). I've also re-added old_name:ru here since it _was_ a valid name before the renaming that happened after last year's Russian invasion of Ukraine.

I've hidden political comments by a blocked user (that Andrey_91177 replied to) above.

I've hidden political comments by a blocked user (that NorthCrab replied to) above.

You are not "adding information". You have removed lots of names.

For the benefit of anyone stumbling over just this changeset, see also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-October/030791.html

Someone's started a thread on the mailing list: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-October/030791.html

Regardless of how they were added, and separately from whether I personally think they're a good idea or not, it makes sense to discuss whether they should be there or not. Taking an example, https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/node/597395247 shows that the story is fairly complicated.
In the case of GB edits, the best place to discuss is the talk-gb mailing list as it'll reach most people.
It should also be mentioned that mass removing or mass-changing tags automatically added by the most popular OSM editor is clearly silly without changing that editor; they will only get re-added.
Best Regards,
Andy

Yes it is:
https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/langcodes_name.php?iso_639_1=hy
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/name%3Ahy#overview

Do you mean Armenian here? If ao, that is normally "hy", and I am very suprised that there is not a _current_ name in that language.

Not easily, as it's not as local to me as it was 13 years ago(!). I probably added a fixme then because what I wrote down didn't match OS OpenData StreetView. It could be that the signage then said "Batewood", or that I wrote it down wrong, or it might even be inconsistent at each end (there are plenty of examples of that round here). If a local has contacted you and said "the name here is X" I'd believe them.

osm.org/user_blocks/15170

Perhaps osm.wiki/Relations_are_not_categories is relevant here?

Hello,
I've filled in the gap in the AONB here with way/1215788024 , following the hedge like - hope that's OK. If you know that the AONB follows a different line (perhaps west of the houses altogether, or down Pump Lane) then please do correct it!
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks

Cześć,
Tutaj Andy z Grupy Roboczej ds. Danych OSM. To, że istnieje oficjalny dokument, nie oznacza, że rozpoczęto budowę drogi. I odwrotnie, to, że zdjęcia lotnicze sugerują, że budowa drogi jeszcze się nie rozpoczęła, nie oznacza, że tak się nie stało – zdjęcia lotnicze mogą być nieaktualne.
Sugeruję, aby jedno lub oboje z was faktycznie odwiedzili to miejsce i wzięli telefon (możesz to łatwo zrobić i dołączyć do notatki OSM za pomocą StreetComplete).
W ten sposób dowiemy się tego na pewno.

Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. Just because an official document exists, it does not mean that road construction has started. Conversely, just because aerial imagery suggests that road construction has not started yet it doesn't mean that it hasn't - the aerial imagery may be out of date.
I'd suggest that one or both of you actually visits the place and takes a phone (you can do this easily, and append to an OSM note, with StreetComplete).
That way, we will know for sure.

Great, thanks!

Great, thanks!